mnort9
mnort9

Reputation: 1820

iPhone App, server-side component, parse integration

This will be my first iOS app with any bit of complexity. I'd like to outline the components and structure to get some feedback before I dive into attempting it.

From the user's perspective, the app monitors the water level of a local lake and receives push notifications when the water level changes a user-specified amount. I think using Parse will be easiest to manage user data and I will attempt a Node.js server-side component on Nodester (I know some basic JS and figure its an good up and coming language to get familiar with). Here's how I see it working...

It actually doesn't sound terribly complex when its typed out. Is this the proper way of structuring this functionality? Am I missing anything? Suggestions are greatly appreciated!

Upvotes: 0

Views: 489

Answers (2)

Cliff
Cliff

Reputation: 11268

You're missing the unhappy path. It's the path programmers never travel while programs always travel. Nothing goes the way we plan it so we have to plan for failures. Ask yourself questions like, "What happens when the server powers down for maintenance or outages and misses one or all of its 3-6 scheduled runs?" "Should the missed executions queue up and send out a bunch of missed notifications?" "What happens when the user changes what they specified as lakeLevelChange but the radio is out and/or the server request cannot complete?" "What happens when Parse gets garbage data in or produces garbage date?" Asking just a few of these will steer you towards an optimal design.

Upvotes: 1

Dan Ray
Dan Ray

Reputation: 21903

Bit of a logic problem:

The server side component will run this program 3-6 times a day:
Pulls a currentLakeLevel via HTTP request.
Pulls user data from Parse
Compares the currentLakeLevel to the user specified lakeLevelChange
If the difference is => lakeLevelChange, a push notification HTTP Post request is sent, per user which their specified condition is met

You actually need to store the level at last alert for each user, too. Otherwise incremental changes could creep over your users' threshhold and never trigger an alert.

Imagine if I said I want to be alerted when the level has changed by 6 inches. You then record seven events in which the level rises by an inch each time. At no point did you observe more than 6 inches of change, but the total change is over my threshold for notification, and I probably meant to have you notify me about that.

So when you fire an alert, you need to store the current level, and then on each change event, you compare that to the last level you notified them about.

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions