Reputation: 41428
This is something I've encountered a few times and haven't been able to find a satisfying answer yet. This seems pretty stupid, but after googling this for a while I couldn't come up with something good.
Let's say I have a class with 20 instance variables, each of which is optional (will be initialized or not).
Now I want my constructor(s) to handle all the cases, in case of a few instance variables it's fine and I can just create constructors with different signatures, but here I have 20, so I would need 2^20=1,048,576 constructors to handle all the cases ! That seems ... not very optimal, don't you agree?
So since with this brute force approach I basically have to construct 2^n constructors, where n is the number of instance variables, I want to find a better way to do it.
I've seen a couple solutions for this problem, but I believe they all on assumptions on the data, but in my case each of these variables can be initialized or not at random, I have no way of knowing that before initialization.
I'm looking for some design patterns or ideas that I could apply to make my code a bit more ... maintainable (no don't worry I didn't create 1M+ constructors :)
Thanks.
Upvotes: 2
Views: 3743
Reputation: 10891
Combine the Bean pattern with a Builder. YourObject will not have inconsistent state halfway through its construction, but it will still take 20+ set operations and you can make YourObject immutable (if you want) - but not YourObjectBuilder.
public class YourObject {
private Type field1;
private Type field2;
private Type field3;
...
YourObject ( Type field1 , Type field2 , Type field3 ... ) { }
}
public class YourObjectBuilder {
private Type field1;
private Type field2;
private Type field3;
...
public YourObjectBuilder() {
}
public YourObject make ( ) {
return new YourObject ( field1 , field2 , field3 ... ) ;
}
public void setField1(Type t) {
field1 = t;
}
public void setField2(Type t) {
field2 = t;
}
public void setField3(Type t) {
field3 = t;
}
...
}
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 308813
Try the Builder pattern:
http://rwhansen.blogspot.com/2007/07/theres-builder-pattern-that-joshua.html
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 44808
public class YourObject {
private Type field1;
private Type field2;
private Type field3;
...
public YourObject() {
}
public void setField1(Type t) {
field1 = t;
}
public void setField2(Type t) {
field2 = t;
}
public void setField3(Type t) {
field3 = t;
}
...
}
Upvotes: 0