Reputation: 759
I have an SQL file containing two tables with around 600,000 rows altogether. Yesterday, I tried to import the file into my MySQL database on Fedora 16, and it took over 2 hours to import the file. On my Windows PC it took 7 minutes. My Linux and Windows machines have exactly the same hardware. A couple of my friends tried it too, and they had a similar experience.
The command we were using was: mysql -u root database_name < sql_file.sql
.
Why is there such a difference in speed?
Upvotes: 43
Views: 47566
Reputation: 1551
Why don't you export .sql file as BULK INSERT
option and import it, try these options while taking a backup using mysqldump
--extended-insert
: use multiple-row insert statements
--quick
: do not do buffering of row data, good if tables are large
Note: Make sure you should increase value of max_allowed_packet
=32M or more in my.cnf file before generating .sql file.
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 182779
My bet is that Fedora 16 is honoring the transaction/sync semantics and Windows is not. If you do the math, 600,000 updates in two hours is 5,000 per minute. That's the same order of magnitude as a disk's rotation rate.
You can try adding SET autocommit=0;
to the beginning of your import file and COMMIT;
to the end. See this page for more information.
Upvotes: 78