CODEWITHSUNDEEP
postgresql
WildBill
WildBill

Reputation: 9291

How to rank in postgres query

I'm trying to rank a subset of data within a table but I think I am doing something wrong. I cannot find much information about the rank() feature for postgres, maybe I'm looking in the wrong place. Either way:

I'd like to know the rank of an id that falls within a cluster of a table based on a date. My query is as follows:

select cluster_id,feed_id,pub_date,rank 
from (select feed_id,pub_date,cluster_id,rank() 
    over (order by pub_date asc) from url_info) 
as bar where cluster_id = 9876 and feed_id = 1234;

I'm modeling this after the following stackoverflow post: postgres rank

The reason I think I am doing something wrong is that there are only 39 rows in url_info that are in cluster_id 9876 and this query ran for 10 minutes and never came back. (actually re-ran it for quite a while and it returned no results, yet there is a row in cluster 9876 for id 1234) I'm expecting this will tell me something like "id 1234 was 5th for the criteria given). It will return a relative rank according to my query constraints, correct?

This is postgres 8.4 btw.

Upvotes: 31

Views: 71648

Answers (2)

Anvesh
Anvesh

Reputation: 7683

Sharing another example of DENSE_RANK() of PostgreSQL. Find top 3 students sample query. Reference taken from this blog:

Create a table with sample data:

CREATE TABLE tbl_Students
(
    StudID INT
    ,StudName CHARACTER VARYING
    ,TotalMark INT
);

INSERT INTO tbl_Students 
VALUES 
(1,'Anvesh',88),(2,'Neevan',78)
,(3,'Roy',90),(4,'Mahi',88)
,(5,'Maria',81),(6,'Jenny',90);

Using DENSE_RANK(), Calculate RANK of students:

;WITH cteStud AS
(
    SELECT 
        StudName
        ,Totalmark
        ,DENSE_RANK() OVER (ORDER BY TotalMark DESC) AS StudRank
    FROM tbl_Students
)
SELECT 
    StudName
    ,Totalmark
    ,StudRank
FROM cteStud 
WHERE StudRank <= 3;

The Result:

studname | totalmark | studrank
----------+-----------+----------
 Roy      |        90 |        1
 Jenny    |        90 |        1
 Anvesh   |        88 |        2
 Mahi     |        88 |        2
 Maria    |        81 |        3
(5 rows)

Upvotes: 8

dbenhur
dbenhur

Reputation: 20408

By placing the rank() function in the subselect and not specifying a PARTITION BY in the over clause or any predicate in that subselect, your query is asking to produce a rank over the entire url_info table ordered by pub_date. This is likely why it ran so long as to rank over all of url_info, Pg must sort the entire table by pub_date, which will take a while if the table is very large.

It appears you want to generate a rank for just the set of records selected by the where clause, in which case, all you need do is eliminate the subselect and the rank function is implicitly over the set of records matching that predicate.

select 
  cluster_id
 ,feed_id
 ,pub_date
 ,rank() over (order by pub_date asc) as rank
from url_info
where cluster_id = 9876 and feed_id = 1234;

If what you really wanted was the rank within the cluster, regardless of the feed_id, you can rank in a subselect which filters to that cluster:

select ranked.*
from (
  select 
    cluster_id
   ,feed_id
   ,pub_date
   ,rank() over (order by pub_date asc) as rank
  from url_info
  where cluster_id = 9876
) as ranked
where feed_id = 1234;

Upvotes: 44

Related Questions