Reputation: 359
Is it possible to mix somehow PreparedStatement batch with Statement batch and keep benefits of both executed in a single transaction?
What I have is my own Data Access Object which represents transaction. I want to use it like this:
/* here transaction starts: object receive connection, etc. */
MyTableTransactionObject myTable = new MyTableTransactionObject();
myTable.clear();
myTable.insert(Row1);
myTable.insert(Row2);
myTable.insert(Row3);
myTable.doSomethingElse();
myTable.insert(Row4);
/* here transaction ends, batches are executed changes are commited,
statements are closed */
myTable.execute();
myTable.close();
"Under the hood" of MyTableTransactionObject there are methods using Statement or PreparedStatements (there may be multiple PreparedStatements). For example: in clear()
method I want to use statement.addBatch("DELETE FROM table;")
, in insert(...)
method I want to use special PreparedStatement to perform SQL INSERT
operation, in doSomethingElse(...)
I want to use different PreparedStatement for something else, etc.
How can I achieve execution of this statements in order they were called on myTable.execute()
?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 1068
Reputation: 357
This is not the most elegant solution, and you will pay out of the %$# in performance, but it does work.
public class DBEngine {
private final int defaultBatchSize = 1000;
private Pool pool = null;
private Connection con = null;
private PreparedStatement ps = null;
private ArrayList<PreparedStatement> globalBatch = new ArrayList<PreparedStatement>();
private int k = 0; //bean-wide batch counter
private boolean debugMode = false;
private PreparedStatement batchPs = null;
//--------------------------------
DBEngine(){
this.pool = new Pool();
this.con = pool.getConnection();
this.ps = null;
this.k = 0; //bean-wide batch counter
}
//-------------
boolean mixedBatchTime(boolean force){
return mixedBatchTime(defaultBatchSize, force);
}
//-------------
boolean mixedBatchTime(int customBatchSize){
return mixedBatchTime(customBatchSize, false);
}
//-------------
boolean mixedBatchTime(){
return mixedBatchTime(defaultBatchSize, false);
}
//-------------
// Executes a mixed batch of PreparedStatements
//-------------
boolean mixedBatchTime(int customBatchSize, boolean force){
if(k > customBatchSize - 1 || force){
try {
StringBuilder sqlStmt = new StringBuilder();
for(int i = 0; i < globalBatch.size(); i++){
sqlStmt.append(globalBatch.get(i) + "; ");
}
batchPs = con.prepareStatement(sqlStmt.toString());
batchPs.execute();
ps = null;
sqlStmt = null;
batchPs = null;
} catch (SQLException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
k = 0;
globalBatch = null;
globalBatch = new ArrayList<PreparedStatement>();
return true;
}else return false;
}
}
You have to increment k in your actual batch preparation section that is inside of your DBEngine bean like:
//------------------------------------------
boolean updateSomeQuantity(int someID, int someQuantity){
try{
// detects if the statement has changed in order to recompile it only once per change
if(ps!=null && !ps.toString().contains("UPDATE sometable SET somequantity =")){
ps = null;
String updateStmt = "UPDATE sometable SET somequantity = ? WHERE someID = ?";
ps = con.prepareStatement(updateStmt);
}else if(ps == null){
String updateStmt = "UPDATE sometable SET somequantity = ? WHERE someID = ?";
ps = con.prepareStatement(updateStmt);
}
ps.setInt(1, someQuantity)
ps.setInt(2, someID);
globalBatch.add(ps);
k++; // very important
return true;
} catch (SQLException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
if(e.getNextException() != null) e.getNextException().printStackTrace();
return false;
}
}
The actual implementation is in another code in which you instantiate an instance of the DBEngine bean and use the updateSomeQuantity(somequantity) method along with the mixedBatchTime() method in a loop. After the loop is finished, call a mixedBatchTime(true) to batch whatever is leftover.
NOTE: This solution uses AutoCommit(true)
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 53694
if your Statements/PreparedStatements share a common Connection and you don't commit the transaction on that Connection, then they will share a common transaction.
Upvotes: 0