Reputation: 1037
There a class and a delegate C#
public delegate void Super();
public class Event
{
public event Super activate ;
public void act()
{
if (activate != null) activate();
}
}
and C++/Cli
public delegate void Super();
public ref class Event
{
public:
event Super ^activate;
void act()
{
activate();
}
};
in C# I create multicast delegate in the class like this(methods Setplus and setminus)
public class ContainerEvents
{
private Event obj;
public ContainerEvents()
{
obj = new Event();
}
public Super Setplus
{
set { obj.activate += value; }
}
public Super Setminus
{
set { obj.activate -= value; }
}
public void Run()
{
obj.act();
}
}
but in C++/Cli I've got an error - usage requires Event::activate to be a data member
public ref class ContainerEvents
{
Event ^obj;
public:
ContainerEvents()
{
obj = gcnew Event();
}
property Super^ Setplus
{
void set(Super^ value)
{
obj->activate = static_cast<Super^>(Delegate::Combine(obj->activate,value));
}
}
property Super^ SetMinus
{
void set(Super^ value)
{
obj->activate = static_cast<Super^>(Delegate::Remove(obj->activate,value));
}
}
void Run()
{
obj->act();
}
};
Where is the problem?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 131
Reputation: 2310
See: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235237(v=vs.80).aspx
C++/CLI follows the same analog as C#. It would be illegal to define this in C#:
public Super Setplus
{
set { obj.activate = Delegate.Combine(obj.activate, value); }
}
It is the same for C++/CLI. Use the +=/-= notation that is defined in the modern syntax.
property Super^ Setplus
{
void set(Super^ value)
{
obj->activate += value;
}
}
Upvotes: 2