CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#multithreadingtimeout
Maxim Zaslavsky
Maxim Zaslavsky

Reputation: 18065

Pausing a method for set # of milliseconds

I need to do a sort of "timeout" or pause in my method for 10 seconds (10000 milliseconds), but I'm not sure if the following would work as i do not have multi-threading.

Thread.Sleep(10000);

I will try to use that current code, but I would appreciate if someone could explain the best and correct way of doing this, especially if the above code does not work properly. Thanks!

UPDATE: This program is actually a console application that in the function in question is doing many HTTPWebRequests to one server, so I wish to delay them for a specified amount of milliseconds. Thus, no callback is required - all that is needed is an "unconditional pause" - basically just the whole thing stops for 10 seconds and then keeps going. I'm pleased that C# still considers this as a thread, so Thread.Sleep(...) would work. Thanks everybody!

Upvotes: 22

Views: 71964

Answers (8)

Hasala Senevirathne
Hasala Senevirathne

Reputation: 67

If you can have an async method, you can do something like to pause the function at a certain location. Once pause is set false it will continue executing the rest of the code in the method. Since this is an async method and delay is async too UI execution wouldn't be affected. * Please note that asyn is supported only in .net 4.5 and higher.

bool pause = true;

       void async foo()
        {
        //some code

            while (pause)
             {
             await Task.Delay(100);
             }

        //some code
        }

Upvotes: -2

MarzSocks
MarzSocks

Reputation: 4318

Here is a pause class that will pause for the desired milliseconds and wont consume your CPU resources.

public class PauseClass
{
    //(C) Michael Roberg
    //Please feel free to distribute this class but include my credentials.

    System.Timers.Timer pauseTimer = null;

    public void BreakPause()
    {
        if (pauseTimer != null)
        {
            pauseTimer.Stop();
            pauseTimer.Enabled = false;
        }    
    }

    public bool Pause(int miliseconds)
    {
        ThreadPriority CurrentPriority = Thread.CurrentThread.Priority;

        if (miliseconds > 0)
        {
            Thread.CurrentThread.Priority = ThreadPriority.Lowest;

            pauseTimer = new System.Timers.Timer();
            pauseTimer.Elapsed += new ElapsedEventHandler(pauseTimer_Elapsed);

            pauseTimer.Interval = miliseconds;
            pauseTimer.Enabled = true;

            while (pauseTimer.Enabled)
            {
                Thread.Sleep(10);
                Application.DoEvents();
                //pausThread.Sleep(1);
            }

            pauseTimer.Elapsed -= new ElapsedEventHandler(pauseTimer_Elapsed);
        }

        Thread.CurrentThread.Priority = CurrentPriority;

        return true;
    }

    private void pauseTimer_Elapsed(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e)
    {
        pauseTimer.Enabled = false;
    }
}

Upvotes: 3

vgru
vgru

Reputation: 51224

You could use a separate thread to do it:

   ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(
       delegate(object state)
       {
           Thread.Sleep(1000);
           Console.WriteLine("done");
       });

But, if this is a Windows Forms app, you will need to invoke the code after the delay from the Gui thread (this article, for example: How to update the GUI from another thread in C#?).

[Edit] Just saw your update. If it's a console app, then this will work. But if you haven't used multiple threads so far, then you need to be aware that this code will be executed in a different thread, which means you will have to take care about thread synchronization issues.

If you don't need background workers, stick to "keeping it simple".

Upvotes: 3

Michael Stum
Michael Stum

Reputation: 180964

Thread.Sleep is fine, and AFAIK the proper way. Even if you are not Multithreaded: There is always at least one Thread, and if you send that to sleep, it sleeps.

Another (bad) way is a spinlock, something like:

// Do never ever use this
private void DoNothing(){ }

private void KillCPU()
{
    DateTime target = DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(10);
    while(DateTime.Now < target) DoNothing();
    DoStuffAfterWaiting10Seconds();
}

This is sadly still being used by people and while it will halt your program for 10 seconds, it will run at 100% CPU Utilization (Well, on Multi-Core systems it's one core).

Upvotes: 4

Ricardo
Ricardo

Reputation: 1025

For a timeout, you should have a static volatile boolean isRunning class field. When the new thread starts, the isRunning must become true, and at the end must become false.

The main thread should have a method that loops for the isRunning during the timeout you define. When the timeout ends, you should implement the logic. But, never use the abort thread method.

A pause... there isn't a straightforward solution. It depends on what you are doing inside the thread. However, you could look at Monitor.Wait.

Upvotes: 0

Marc Gravell
Marc Gravell

Reputation: 1063013

That will indeed pause the executing thread/method for 10 seconds. Are you seeing a specific problem?

Note that you shouldn't Sleep the UI thread - it would be better to do a callback instead.

Note also that there are other ways of blocking a thread that allow simpler access to get it going again (if you find it is OK after 2s); such as Monitor.Wait(obj, 10000) (allowing another thread to Pulse if needed to wake it up):

static void Main() {
    object lockObj = new object();
    lock (lockObj) {
        new Thread(GetInput).Start(lockObj);
        Monitor.Wait(lockObj, 10000);
    }
    Console.WriteLine("Main exiting");
}
static void GetInput(object state) {
    Console.WriteLine("press return...");
    string s = Console.ReadLine();
    lock (state) {
        Monitor.Pulse(state);
    }
    Console.WriteLine("GetInput exiting");
}

You can do this with Thread.Interrupt too, but IMO that is messier.

Upvotes: 3

Guffa
Guffa

Reputation: 700422

Yes, that works just fine.

You don't have to have multiple threads to make use of some of the methods in the Thread class. You always have at least one thread.

Upvotes: 1

Jon Skeet
Jon Skeet

Reputation: 1501043

You may not have multi-threading, but you're still executing within a thread: all code executes in a thread.

Calling Thread.Sleep will indeed pause the current thread. Do you really want it to unconditionally pause for 10 seconds, or do you want to be able to be "woken up" by something else happening? If you're only actually using one thread, calling Sleep may well be the best way forward, but it will depend on the situation.

In particular, if you're writing a GUI app you don't want to use Thread.Sleep from the UI thread, as otherwise your whole app will become unresponsive for 10 seconds.

If you could give more information about your application, that would help us to advise you better.

Upvotes: 23

Related Questions