CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#reference
Dasha Salo
Dasha Salo

Reputation: 5169

C# reference to loop variable

Is it possible in C# to something like the following

foreach (ref string var in arr) {
    var = "new value";
}

so that var variable was treated as reference and assigning to var would change an array element?

Upvotes: 7

Views: 7809

Answers (5)

Lurkeroid
Lurkeroid

Reputation: 603

In the case of a string, no; C# strings are immutable (cannot be changed). If you were enumerating over objects of a different, mutable type, you can change the properties of those objects.

Just to illustrate what Jacob is talking about. Consider the code snippet below:

class MyInt
{
    public int Val { get; set; }
    public MyInt(int val) { this.Val = val; }
}

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        MyInt[] array = new MyInt[] { new MyInt(1), new MyInt(2) };

        foreach (var obj in array) Console.Write("{0}\t", obj.Val);

        foreach (var obj in array)
        { 
            obj = new MyInt(100); // This doesn't compile! the reference is read only
            obj.Val *= 10; // This works just fine!
        }

        foreach (var obj in array) Console.Write("{0}\t", obj.Val);
    }
}

Indeed, if you try to assign to the "obj" as above you'll get a compile time error. But nothing prevents you from modifying MyInt's properties through the "obj" reference

Upvotes: 1

Talljoe
Talljoe

Reputation: 14827

foreach(string s in strings)
{
  Console.WriteLine(s);
}

is compiler shortcut for:

IEnumerator e = strings.GetEnumerator();
string s;
while(e.MoveNext())
{
  s = e.Current;
  Console.WriteLine(s);
}

Since IEnumerator.Current is a get-only property you can't set the value.

// Non-generic IEnumerator shown.
interface IEnumerator
{
  bool MoveNext();
  object Current { get; }
  void Reset();
}

If you want to support an updatable enumerator you will need to create it yourself -- but you won't be able to use "foreach" with it, and you'll have to implement wrappers around all the common IEnumerable classes.

You'll have to analyze your current situation and figure out how to update. If you're using an IList interface you can do:

for(int i = 0; i < strings.Count; ++i)
{
  string s = strings[i];
  //do work
  s = s.ToUpperInvariant();
  strings[i] = s;
}

Upvotes: 2

Jacob
Jacob

Reputation: 78870

In the case of a string, no; C# strings are immutable (cannot be changed). If you were enumerating over objects of a different, mutable type, you can change the properties of those objects.

Upvotes: 0

J&#248;rn Schou-Rode
J&#248;rn Schou-Rode

Reputation: 38336

No. The foreach statement is simply syntax sugar on top of the IEnumerable interface. This interface defines a method to get en IEnumerator which in turn has methods to do read-only enumeration:

  • Current : object
  • MoveNext() : bool
  • Reset() : void

Upvotes: 2

Marc Gravell
Marc Gravell

Reputation: 1063198

There is no such construct for updating a loop; an iterator is read-only. For example, the following provides a perfectly valid iterator:

public IEnumerable<int> Get1Thru5() {
    yield return 1; yield return 2; yield return 3;
    yield return 4; yield return 5;
}

How would it update? What would it update?

If the data is an array/list/etc, then something like:

for(int i = 0 ; i < arr.Length ; i++) {
    arr[i] = "new value";
}

Or other options depending on the specific container.

Update; at a push, an extension method:

public static void UpdateAll<T>(this IList<T> list, Func<T, T> operation) {
    for (int i = 0; i < list.Count; i++) {
        list[i] = operation(list[i]);
    }
}
static void Main() {
    string[] arr = { "abc", "def", "ghi" };
    arr.UpdateAll(s => "new value");
    foreach (string s in arr) Console.WriteLine(s);
}

Upvotes: 22

Related Questions