CODEWITHSUNDEEP
cpointers
sourabh912
sourabh912

Reputation: 679

string pointers in c

#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
    char *s[] = { "knowledge","is","power"};
    char **p;
    p = s;
    printf("%s ", ++*p);
    printf("%s ", *p++);
    printf("%s ", ++*p);

    return 0;
}

Output:

nowledge nowledge s

Please explain the output specially output from the 2nd printf() statement.I think that because ++ and * have same precedence therefore in *p++ p should be incremented first and then use *(associativity from right to left for unary operators).

Upvotes: 0

Views: 330

Answers (4)

Dave
Dave

Reputation: 11162

When faced with tricky sequences of operators, it's often easy to rewrite it as a series of simple statements. Your block becomes:

p[0]++;  //skips over the 'k' in knowledge
printf("%s", *p);
printf("%s", *p);
p++;     //moves to the next word
p[0]++;  //skips over the 'i' in is
printf("%s", *p);

Upvotes: 1

j4x
j4x

Reputation: 3716

According to C++ Operator Precedence:

  1. "*" has the same precedence as prefix "++" but must be avaluated rigth to left.

    printf("%s ", ++*p);

So first *p is evaluated, then ++(*p), leading to the second character in the first string.

  1. "*" has less precedence than suffix "++".

    printf("%s ", *p++);

So first p is incremented, but it is a post-increment. The value returned from the operation is the original one. This way, the * operates over the original pointer, that pointed to the second char on the first string.

Note that, this time, ++ is operating over p, and not over *p.

  1. Since "2", p points to the second string. When you do ++*p you are now pointing to the second character of the second string ("s"). As you are again using a pre-increment, the value passed to printf is already changed.

    printf("%s ", ++*p);

I may get clearer if you do a little change and print the pointer value aswell (ignore the warnings):

printf("%s [%p]\n", ++*p, p );
printf("%s [%p]\n ", *p++, p );
printf("%s [%p]\n ", ++*p, p );

nowledge [0x7fff6f5519e0]
nowledge [0x7fff6f5519e8]
 s [0x7fff6f5519e8]

Upvotes: 3

Eric Finn
Eric Finn

Reputation: 8985

The value that the increment postfix operator (p++) evaluates to is p. The value that the increment prefix operator (++p) evaluates to is p+1.

In your second printf, *p++ evaluates to what *p would evaluate to, but has the side effect of incrementing p.

Upvotes: 2

Rocky Pulley
Rocky Pulley

Reputation: 23301

first one increments *p and displays the string (setting it to the n in knowldege). second one displays the string *p then increments p (moving it to "is"). third one increments *p then displays the string (which starts at the s in "is").

Upvotes: 5

Related Questions