Reputation: 1369
I was going through k&r complicated declarations part.I got doubt about this particular declaration.
char(*(*x[3])())[5]
Why cant it be
char[5] (*(*x[3])())
And can this declaration be legal?
int* (*(*x)())[2];
Upvotes: 0
Views: 156
Reputation: 28535
According to the precedence of operators and applying the spiral rule,
char(*(*x[3])())[5]
is equivalent to
x is array of pointers to functions returning pointer to array of char
But in,
char[5] (*(*x[3])())
the array subscript should be at the end of the declaration, thus resulting in a syntax error. You'll bump into nothing
when you apply spiral rule to this.
Also,
int* (*(*x)())[2];
is perfectly legal and its declaration can be stated as
x is pointer to function returning pointer to array of pointer to int
Check out the Java applet which can help you decode complicated declarations and also read these articles of how to form complicated declarations.
@Steve Jessop's comment also seems plausible as to why the []
go at the end.
Upvotes: 1