CODEWITHSUNDEEP
pythonxmllxml
ejang
ejang

Reputation: 4062

parsing large xml file with Python - etree.parse error

Trying to parse the following Python file using the lxml.etree.iterparse function.

"sampleoutput.xml"

<item>
  <title>Item 1</title>
  <desc>Description 1</desc>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Item 2</title>
  <desc>Description 2</desc>
</item>

I tried the code from Parsing Large XML file with Python lxml and Iterparse

before the etree.iterparse(MYFILE) call I did MYFILE = open("/Users/eric/Desktop/wikipedia_map/sampleoutput.xml","r")

But it turns up the following error 

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/eric/Documents/Programming/Eclipse_Workspace/wikipedia_mapper/testscraper.py", line 6, in <module>
    for event, elem in context :
  File "iterparse.pxi", line 491, in lxml.etree.iterparse.__next__ (src/lxml/lxml.etree.c:98565)
  File "iterparse.pxi", line 543, in lxml.etree.iterparse._read_more_events (src/lxml/lxml.etree.c:99086)
  File "parser.pxi", line 590, in lxml.etree._raiseParseError (src/lxml/lxml.etree.c:74712)
lxml.etree.XMLSyntaxError: Extra content at the end of the document, line 5, column 1

any ideas? thank you!

Upvotes: 11

Views: 9670

Answers (2)

sblom
sblom

Reputation: 27363

The problem is that XML isn't well-formed if it doesn't have exactly one top-level tag. You can fix your sample by wrapping the entire document in <items></items> tags. You also need the <desc/> tags to match the query that you're using (description).

The following document produces correct results with your existing code:

<items>
  <item>
    <title>Item 1</title>
    <description>Description 1</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Item 2</title>
    <description>Description 2</description>
  </item>
</items>

Upvotes: 14

Michael Schlottke-Lakemper
Michael Schlottke-Lakemper

Reputation: 9341

As far as I know, xml.etree.ElementTree usually expects the XML file to contain one "root" element, i.e. one XML tag that encloses the complete document structure. From the error message you posted I would assume that this is the problem here as well:

´Line 5´ refers to the second <item> tag, so I guess Python complains that there is more data following after the assumed root element (i.e. the first <item> tag) was closed.

Upvotes: 5

Related Questions