CODEWITHSUNDEEP
scala
Sergey Weiss
Sergey Weiss

Reputation: 5974

Type equality in Scala

Here is a little snippet of code:

class Foo[A] {
  def foo[B](param: SomeClass[B]) {
  //
  }
}

Now, inside foo, how do I:
1) verify if B is the same type as A?
2) verify if B is a subtype of A?

Upvotes: 8

Views: 6429

Answers (3)

Ptharien's Flame
Ptharien's Flame

Reputation: 3246

As a side note, generalized type constraints aren't actually necessary:

class Foo[A] {
  def foo_subParam[B <: A](param: SomeClass[B]) {...}
  def foo_supParam[B >: A](param: SomeClass[B]) {...}
  def foo_eqParam[B >: A <: A](param: SomeClass[B]) {...}
  def foo_subMyType[Dummy >: MyType <: A] {...}
  def foo_supMyType[Dummy >: A <: MyType] {...}
  def foo_eqMyType[Dummy1 >: MyType <: A, Dummy2 >: A <: MyType] {...}
}

In fact, I prefer this way, because it both slightly improves type inference and guarantees that no extraneous runtime data is used.

Upvotes: 7

missingfaktor
missingfaktor

Reputation: 92106

1) verify if B is the same type as A?

class Foo[A] {
  def foo(param: SomeClass[A]) = ???
}

// or

class Foo[A] {
  def foo[B](param: SomeClass[B])(implicit ev: A =:= B) = ???
}

2) verify if B is a subtype of A?

class Foo[A] {
  def foo[B <: A](param: SomeClass[B]) = ???
}

// or

class Foo[A] {
  def foo[B](param: SomeClass[B])(implicit ev: B <:< A) = ???
}

In your case, you do not need generalized type constraints (i.e. =:=, <:<). They're required when you need to add a constraint on the type parameter that is defined elsewhere, not on the method.

e.g. To ensure A is a String:

class Foo[A] {
  def regularMethod = ???
  def stringSpecificMethod(implicit ev: A =:= String) = ???
}

Here you cannot enforce the type constraint without a generalized type constraint.

Upvotes: 6

xiefei
xiefei

Reputation: 6609

You need implicit type evidences, <:< for subtype check and =:= for same type check. See the answers for this question.

Upvotes: 7

Related Questions