Reputation: 18549
I have cloned a repository, after which somebody else has created a new branch, which I'd like to start working on. I read the manual, and it seems dead straight easy. Strangely it's not working, and all the posts I've found suggest I'm doing the right thing. So I'll subject myself to the lambasting, because there must be something obviously wrong with this:
The correct action seems to be
git fetch
git branch -a
* master
remotes/origin/HEAD --> origin/master
remotes/origin/master
git checkout -b dev-gml origin/dev-gml
At this point there is a problem, for some reason after git fetch
I can't see the dev-gml remote branch. Why not? If I clone the repository freshly, it's there, so certainly the remote branch exists:
$ mkdir ../gitest
$ cd ../gitest
$ git clone https://github.com/example/proj.git
Cloning into proj...
remote: Counting objects: 1155, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (383/383), done.
remote: Total 1155 (delta 741), reused 1155 (delta 741)
Receiving objects: 100% (1155/1155), 477.22 KiB | 877 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (741/741), done.
$ cd projdir
$ git branch -a
* master
remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
remotes/origin/dev-gml
remotes/origin/master
I've tried git update
, git pull
, git fetch --all
, git pretty-please
in all possible permutations...
Upvotes: 415
Views: 311956
Reputation: 3374
write it from the terminal
git fetch --prune
it works fine.
Upvotes: 9
Reputation: 460
A possible solution:
git remote update --prune
It synchronizes your local repository with remotes. The prune option removes references to deleted remote branches.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 10428
The problem can be seen when checking the remote.origin.fetch
setting
(The lines starting with $
are bash prompts with the commands I typed. The other lines are the resulting output)
$ git config --get remote.origin.fetch
+refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master
As you can see, in my case, the remote was set to fetch the master branch specifically and only. I fixed it as per below, including the second command to check the results.
$ git config remote.origin.fetch "+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*"
$ git config --get remote.origin.fetch
+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
The wildcard *
of course means everything under that path.
Unfortunately I saw this comment after I had already dug through and found the answer by trial and error.
Edit: It seems this happens if you do a shallow clone - e.g. git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SomeRepo
would cause this problem.
Adding from the comments
Note that this can happen if you have cloned your repository with a single branch only, e.g. git clone --branch --single-branch [] – Narretz
A shallow clone with git clone --depth implies --single-branch, as noted in the man page git-clone(1), so we'd better do it with git clone --depth --no-single-branch . – whatacold
Upvotes: 785
Reputation: 6525
My issue: fetch and checkout tell me not found, re-clone works.
git config --get remote.origin.fetch
output:
+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
Seems no problem.
Because the commit I try to checkout is on a tag but not a branch, I try to
git fetch --tags
, then checkout the commit, it works finally!
See https://stackoverflow.com/a/14946840/5281824 to configure git to fetch all branches and tags.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 6388
You need to run
git remote update
or
git remote update <remote>
Then you can run git branch -r
to list the remote branches.
To track a (new) remote branch as a local branch:
git checkout -b <local branch> <remote>/<remote branch>
or (sometimes it doesn't work without the extra remotes/
):
git checkout -b <local branch> remotes/<remote>/<remote branch>
Upvotes: 123
Reputation: 329
I had cloned the repo with --depth 1, so these answers weren't working. What did work for me was
git fetch origin BRANCHNAME:BRANCHNAME
It succesfully created a local branch with the same name.
Upvotes: 10
Reputation: 663
All you need to do is, apply the following 2 commands:
git fetch --all
And once you see the branch (which was not visible before e.g. osc_at_works), select that and checkout as below:
git checkout origin/team/Enterprise/osc_at_works
Upvotes: -2
Reputation: 2558
git checkout --track origin/formats
seemed to do the trick:
% git branch ### show local branches
* main
% git branch - a ### show local and remote branches
* main
remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/main
remote/origin/formats
remote/origin/main
% git checkout --track origin/formats
Switched to a new branch 'formats'
Branch 'formats' set up to track remote branch 'formats' from 'origin'
% git branch
* formats
main
The following should do the same but with different local branch name:
git checkout -b my-formats origin/formats
A new syntax git switch
is available in git c2.23
git switch -c <branch> --track <remote>/<branch>
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 8376
Had the same problem today setting up my repo from scratch. I tried everything, nothing worked except removing the origin and re-adding it back again.
git remote rm origin
git remote add origin [email protected]:web3coach/the-blockchain-bar-newsletter-edition.git
git fetch --all
// Ta daaa all branches fetched
Upvotes: 38
Reputation: 15569
I had a similar problem, however in my case I could pull/push to the remote branch but git status
didn't show the local branch state w.r.t the remote ones.
Also, in my case git config --get remote.origin.fetch
didn't return anything
The problem is that there was a typo in the .git/config
file in the fetch line of the respective remote block. Probably something I added by mistake previously (sometimes I directly look at this file, or even edit it)
So, check if your remote entry in the .git/config
file is correct, e.g.:
[remote "origin"]
url = https://[server]/[user or organization]/[repo].git
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 3016
I had this issue today on a repo.
It wasn't the +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
issue as per top solution.
Symptom was simply that git fetch origin
or git fetch
just didn't appear to do anything, although there were remote branches to fetch.
After trying lots of things, I removed the origin remote, and recreated it. That seems to have fixed it. Don't know why.
remove with:
git remote rm origin
and recreate with:
git remote add origin <git uri>
Upvotes: 280
Reputation: 401
To make it more specific Create a tracking branch, which means you are now tracking a remote branch.
git branch --track branch remote-branch
git branch --track exp remotes/origin/experimental
After which you can
git branch # to see the remote tracking branch "exp" created .
Then to work on that branch do
git checkout branchname
git checkout exp
After you have made changes to the branch. You can git fetch and git merge with your remote tracking branch to merge your changes and push to the remote branch as below.
git fetch origin
git merge origin/experimental
git push origin/experimental
Hope it helps and gives you an idea, how this works.
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 18746
I had to go into my GitExtensions Remote Repositories as nothing here seemed to be working. There I saw that 2 branches had no remote repository configured. after adjusting it looks as follows
Notice branch noExternal3
still shows as not having a remote repository. Not sure what combo of bash commands would have found or adjusted that.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1326
This could be due to a face palm moment: if you switch between several clones it is easy to find yourself in the wrong source tree trying to pull a non-existent branch. It is easier when the clones have similar names, or the repos are distinct clones for the same project from each of multiple contributors. A new git clone would obviously seem to solve that "problem" when the real problem is losing focus or working context or both.
Upvotes: 1