Reputation: 3745
MDN - Stacking without z-index states that when no element in a page has a z-index, elements are stacked in this order:
But that seems not the case when an element of opacity less than 1 is involved:
Is it safe to assume that the real order is the following?
Upvotes: 3
Views: 466
Reputation: 18795
Looks like that MDN article is just the basic version of the actual stacking contexts explanation, which is also touched on in the visual formatting module. However, this particular gotcha is from the CSS color module (emphasis mine):
Since an element with opacity less than 1 is composited from a single offscreen image, content outside of it cannot be layered in z-order between pieces of content inside of it. For the same reason, implementations must create a new stacking context for any element with opacity less than 1. If an element with opacity less than 1 is not positioned, implementations must paint the layer it creates, within its parent stacking context, at the same stacking order that would be used if it were a positioned element with ‘z-index: 0’ and ‘opacity: 1’. If an element with opacity less than 1 is positioned, the ‘z-index’ property applies as described in [CSS21], except that ‘auto’ is treated as ‘0’ since a new stacking context is always created. See section 9.9 and Appendix E of [CSS21] for more information on stacking contexts. The rules in this paragraph do not apply to SVG elements, since SVG has its own rendering model ([SVG11], Chapter 3).
Upvotes: 4