Reputation: 8004
I thought I had my CSS down fairly well but I cannot seem to figure out why this problem occurs. I must be doing something wrong.
So if I want to select multiple elements that are children to a div I could write:
#mydiv > input, label{
}
Am I correct? I thought this to be true until I realized that other inputs and labels in my site were inheriting these CSS properties even though they were not in the div called #mydiv. To fix the issue I had to use:
#mydiv > input, #mydiv > label {
}
But I am pretty sure that this is not the quickest way to do so. I tried checking the Selector Page on W3.org but they do not give an example for my situation.
What am I doing wrong?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 334
Reputation: 359966
Am I correct?
No. The grouping selector (comma) has the lowest precedence, so you cannot use it to select multiple elements that are children of a div using this selector:
#mydiv > input, label
The most concise selector is the one that you found on your own:
#mydiv > input, #mydiv > label
You can DRY things up a bit using nested rules in LESS or Sass, though that does introduce a dependency in your code and/or build process.
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 460
Your second method is good
#mydiv > input, #mydiv > label {
}
If you wanted to somehow do this without using multiple selectors separated by a comma, you could use a class name for both your input and label elements
.your-class-name {
}
or if for some reason input and label were the only two types of child elements for #mydiv, then you could use the universal selector like this:
#mydiv > * {
}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 29658
Your second snippet is the simplest way to do it with pure CSS. The comma ,
separates isolated CSS selectors, so that's why you needed to begin each with #mydiv
for both selectors.
You could use something like LESS, which would allow nested rules. Non-germane example:
#header {
h1 {
font-size: 26px;
font-weight: bold;
}
p { font-size: 12px;
a { text-decoration: none;
&:hover { border-width: 1px }
}
}
}
But you're probably better off with pure CSS.
Upvotes: 1