user1043144
user1043144

Reputation: 2710

frequency table with several variables in R

I am trying to replicate a table often used in official statistics but no success so far. Given a dataframe like this one:

d1 <- data.frame( StudentID = c("x1", "x10", "x2", 
                          "x3", "x4", "x5", "x6", "x7", "x8", "x9"),
             StudentGender = c('F', 'M', 'F', 'M', 'F', 'M', 'F', 'M', 'M', 'M'),
             ExamenYear    = c('2007','2007','2007','2008','2008','2008','2008','2009','2009','2009'),
             Exam          = c('algebra', 'stats', 'bio', 'algebra', 'algebra', 'stats', 'stats', 'algebra', 'bio', 'bio'),
             participated  = c('no','yes','yes','yes','no','yes','yes','yes','yes','yes'),  
             passed      = c('no','yes','yes','yes','no','yes','yes','yes','no','yes'),
             stringsAsFactors = FALSE)

I would like to create a table showing PER YEAR , the number of all students (all) and those who are female, those who participated and those who passed. Please note "ofwhich" below refers to all students.

A table I have in mind would look like that:

cbind(All = table(d1$ExamenYear),
  participated      = table(d1$ExamenYear, d1$participated)[,2],
  ofwhichFemale     = table(d1$ExamenYear, d1$StudentGender)[,1],
  ofwhichpassed     = table(d1$ExamenYear, d1$passed)[,2])

I am sure there is a better way to this kind of thing in R.

Note: I have seen LaTex solutions, but I am not use this will work for me as I need to export the table in Excel .

Thanks in advance

Upvotes: 7

Views: 15988

Answers (4)

Randy Lai
Randy Lai

Reputation: 3174

You may also want to take a look of the plyr's next iterator: dplyr

It uses a ggplot-like syntax and provide fast performance by writing key pieces in C++.

d1 %.% 
group_by(ExamenYear) %.%    
summarise(ALL=length(ExamenYear),
          participated=sum(participated=="yes"),
          ofwhichFemale=sum(StudentGender=="F"),
          ofWhichPassed=sum(passed=="yes"))

Upvotes: 1

IRTFM
IRTFM

Reputation: 263301

There could have been a couple of modifications (use with to reduce the number of df$ calls and use character indices to improve self-documentation) to your code that would have made it easier to read and a worthy competitor to the ddply solutions:

with( d1, cbind(All = table(ExamenYear),
  participated      = table(ExamenYear, participated)[,"yes"],
  ofwhichFemale     = table(ExamenYear, StudentGender)[,"F"],
  ofwhichpassed     = table(ExamenYear, passed)[,"yes"])
     )

     All participated ofwhichFemale ofwhichpassed
2007   3            2             2             2
2008   4            3             2             3
2009   3            3             0             2

I would expect this to be much faster than the ddply solution, although that will only be apparent if you are working on larger datasets.

Upvotes: 4

csgillespie
csgillespie

Reputation: 60452

The plyr package is great for this sort of thing. First load the package

library(plyr)

Then we use the ddply function:

ddply(d1, "ExamenYear", summarise, 
      All = length(passed),##We can use any column for this statistics
      participated = sum(participated=="yes"),
      ofwhichFemale = sum(StudentGender=="F"),
      ofwhichpassed = sum(passed=="yes"))

Basically, ddply expects a dataframe as input and returns a data frame. We then split up the input data frame by ExamenYear. On each sub table we calculate a few summary statistics. Notice that in ddply, we don't have to use the $ notation when referring to columns.

Upvotes: 4

Andy
Andy

Reputation: 4659

Using plyr:

require(plyr)
ddply(d1, .(ExamenYear), summarize,
      All=length(ExamenYear),
      participated=sum(participated=="yes"),
      ofwhichFemale=sum(StudentGender=="F"),
      ofWhichPassed=sum(passed=="yes"))

Which gives:

  ExamenYear All participated ofwhichFemale ofWhichPassed
1       2007   3            2             2             2
2       2008   4            3             2             3
3       2009   3            3             0             2

Upvotes: 9

Related Questions