Reputation: 646
I have a problem about main threads and other threads in the same process. When the main function returns, do the other threads exit too? I am confused about this.
Consider the following test code:
void* test1(void *arg)
{
unsigned int i = 0;
while (1){
i+=1;
}
return NULL;
}
void* test2(void *arg)
{
long double i = 1.0;
while (1){
i *= 1.1;
}
return NULL;
}
void startThread ( void * (*run)(void*), void *arg) {
pthread_t t;
pthread_attr_t attr;
if (pthread_attr_init(&attr) != 0
|| pthread_create(&t, &attr, run, arg) != 0
|| pthread_attr_destroy(&attr) != 0
|| pthread_detach(t) != 0) {
printf("Unable to launch a thread\n");
exit(1);
}
}
int main()
{
startThread(test1, NULL);
startThread(test2, NULL);
sleep(4);
printf("main thread return.\n");
return 0;
}
When the "main thread return." prints out, thread test1 and test2 also exit, can anyone tell me why?
Upvotes: 34
Views: 46030
Reputation: 67
As an aside on the same subject, I'd like to point out what seems to me an inaccuracy in the 3rd edition of APUE (Stevens & Rago). In section 7.3 it says "Normal termination occurs in five ways" and, among them it puts "Calling pthread_exit (Section 11.5) from the last thread". It seems to me that this is not true, because either main is still running (and pthread_exit doesn't terminate the program since main will do that) or main has already returned, so terminating the program, as this article correctly states.
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 154
All the threads in your process will be terminated when you return from main()
.
The libc
library is the one responsible for implementing this behavior by calling exit()
when the main()
function returns. In turn, the exit()
function will end up calling a thin-wrapper function named _exit()
which (starting from libc
v2.3) will finally invoke the exit_group system call and end up your process and also terminate all its threads.
This last system call is the one responsible for the behavior you noticed.
We can see this subtle note in the _exit()
manual here:
C library/kernel differences
In glibc up to version 2.3, the _exit() wrapper function invoked
the kernel system call of the same name. Since glibc 2.3, the
wrapper function invokes exit_group(2), in order to terminate all
of the threads in a process.
If your intention is to avoid this behavior, the only option is to call pthread_exit
which will end your main thread and prevent you from returning to the libc
's __libc_start_main()
function.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 213278
When the main thread returns (i.e., you return from the main
function), it terminates the entire process. This includes all other threads. The same thing happens when you call exit
. You can avoid this by calling pthread_exit
.
The purpose of pthread_detach
is to make it so you don't need to join with other threads in order to release their resources. Detaching a thread does not make it exist past process termination, it will still be destroyed along with all the other threads.
Upvotes: 31
Reputation: 59607
You should use pthread_join()
on each of the new threads, to inform the calling thread to wait on the sub-threads, suspending execution - and process exit - until those threads terminate.
Calling pthread_detach
on the created threads won't keep them around after a process exits. From the linux man page:
The detached attribute merely determines the behavior of the system when the thread terminates; it does not prevent the thread from being terminated if the process terminates using exit(3) (or equivalently, if the main thread returns).
You'll sometimes see a pthread_exit
in main
used instead of explicit pthread_join
calls, the intent being that exiting main
in this way will allow other threads to continue running. In fact, the linux man page states this explicitly:
To allow other threads to continue execution, the main thread should terminate by calling pthread_exit() rather than exit(3).
But I don't know if this is expected behavior on all platforms, and I've always stuck to using pthread_join
.
pthread_join
requires the pthread_t
for the target thread, so your code will need to change a bit since you need to create both threads before calling pthread_join
to wait for them both. So you can't call it in startThread
. You'll need to return a pthread_t
, or pass a pointer to a pthread_t
to your startThread
function.
Upvotes: 32