CODEWITHSUNDEEP
.netwinformsado.netclass-designdata-access
Chris Burgess
Chris Burgess

Reputation: 5835

Multiple SQlCommand.ExecuteReader calls or do it once with datareader.NextResult()?

I'm using a SqlDataReader to populate an entity in a Winform app. The entity class has several foreign key attributes in the database that I want to setup as properties in the entity class. Each property will be of type 'Attribute' with an ID & Description property.

Some of the users of the system are far from the database, so data access performance is a serious consideration.

I could either execute the SqlCommand.ExecuteReader multiple times (once for each attribute) against a stored proc that returns a single resultset, or I could execute the SqlCommand.ExecuteReader once against a stored proc that returns multiple result sets and use the SqlDataReader.NextResult to move through them and setup the attributes.

If I loop through with .NextResult, I get into some issues with making sure the stored proc and the property assignment looping are aligned. If the order of SELECT statements in the proc change order, then the assignment order in the winform app would get messed up.

If the SqlDataReader goes back to the database for each read anyway, is there much time added executing the SqlCommand.ExecuteReader? Doing an ExecuteReader for each attribute would make things clearer on the assignment side.

Thanks!

Upvotes: 1

Views: 2273

Answers (1)

Charles Bretana
Charles Bretana

Reputation: 146557

Using .Nextresult, ADO.Net does not go back to the database for each result set. All this logic is in the ADO.Net data Provider, where ever that is running (in your data access layer, probably on your application server, or in your UI layer, whereever)

if you execute the datareader multiple times, however, you will be making one rtound trip to the database for each call. So if the layer where this code is executing is some distance (in round-trip-time) away from the DB, you would be better off to use the .NextResult technique.

You should also consider using a DataSet (with multiple DataTables) instead of a data reader.... you might find this more performant.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions