Reputation: 7059
I have been successfully using gcc on Linux Mint 12. Now I am getting an error. I have recently been doing some .so builds and installed Clang not to long ago, but have successfully compiled since both of those events, so not sure what has changed. I used the GUI Software Manager to remove and then install gcc again, but the results are the same:
~/code/c/ut: which gcc
/usr/bin/gcc
~/code/c/ut: gcc -std=c99 -Wall -Wextra -g -c object.c
gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory
Upvotes: 174
Views: 449409
Reputation: 69
It's possible GCC_EXEC_PREFIX
does some trick as well
gcc will find the executables, libraries, include files, and data files of the compiler itself via option -B
or environment variable GCC_EXEC_PREFIX
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 634
Just an example. You might find your cc1
installed on other places depends on whatever software was installed before.
find /usr/ -name "*cc1*"
# out: /usr/share/terminfo/x/xterm+pcc1
# out: /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.2/cc1
# out: /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.2/cc1plus
export PATH=$PATH:/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.2/
credit belong to programmerah
And of course, this is more from the Pen tester perspective. Please using proper method to resolve it like other answers mentioned.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 3804
Amazon Linux: fixing GCC issue
Since this comes up as the first result on Google, I just wanted to document my experience with Amazon Linux. Installing gcc-c++.noarch
fixed the problem:
sudo yum install gcc-c++.noarch
Some people also reported this alternative as a solution (@CoderChris):
sudo yum install gcc72-c++
Others reported doing sudo yum install gcc
first, then sudo yum install gcc-c++
. (@Wilmer E. Henao, @Talha Anwar)
Upvotes: 20
Reputation: 4300
Adding my solution for Amazon Linux - Working in 2021:
sudo yum install gcc
and then:
sudo yum install gcc-c++
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 807
For Amazon Linux Release 2 This will solve the issue:
sudo yum install gcc-c++
(This will not work: sudo yum install gcc72-c++
)
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 477
I would like to add some additional answer, for the ones who the most liked answer didn't help.
I accidentally deleted some of files in /usr/lib
and /usr/local/bin
so apt
couldn't reinstall gcc
and build-essential
packages correctly. I've tried almost everything, but, at the end only restoring the whole dependency tree helped. On Ubuntu 20.04 I've run the following:
sudo apt install --reinstall \
binutils \
binutils-common \
binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu \
cpp \
cpp-9 \
gcc \
gcc-10-base \
gcc-9 \
gcc-9-base \
libasan5 \
libatomic1 \
libbinutils \
libc-dev-bin \
libc6 \
libc6-dev \
libcc1-0 \
libcrypt-dev \
libcrypt1 \
libctf-nobfd0 \
libctf0 \
libgcc-9-dev \
libgcc-s1 \
libgmp10 \
libgomp1 \
libidn2-0 \
libisl22 \
libitm1 \
liblsan0 \
libmpc3 \
libmpfr6 \
libquadmath0 \
libstdc++6 \
libtsan0 \
libubsan1 \
libunistring2 \
linux-libc-dev \
manpages \
manpages-dev \
zlib1g
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 175
Im my rare case the PATH variable was set but not exported. Simply exporting the PATH variable was solving this problem.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 358
Documenting another source of errors for installing gcc-10 on Amazon Linux 2 from source.
After running sudo make install
and then testing gcc-10
I got this error:
gcc-10: fatal error: cannot execute ‘cc1’: execvp: No such file or directory
The reason was that the new g++ directories under /usr/local/
were created by sudo make install
have 700
permissions so non-root users cannot see the directories content.
I fixed it by running
sudo find /usr/local/ -type d -exec chmod 755 {} \;
Note that I followed this snippet https://gist.github.com/nchaigne/ad06bc867f911a3c0d32939f1e930a11
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 4553
The error message told us, that the build-time dependency (in this case it is cc1
) was not found, so all we need — install the appropriate package to the system (using package manager // from sources // another way)
What is cc1
:
cc1
is the internal command which takes preprocessed C-language files and converts them to assembly. It's the actual part that compiles C. For C++, there's cc1plus, and other internal commands for different languages.
taken from this answer by Alan Shutko.
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install --reinstall build-essential
If you are in docker-alpine environment install the build-base package by adding this to your Dockerfile
:
RUN apk add build-base
Better package name provided by Pablo Castellano. More details here.
If you need more packages for building purposes, consider adding of the alpine-sdk package:
RUN apk add alpine-sdk
Taken from github
This answer contains instructions for CentOS and Fedora Linux
sudo yum install gcc72-c++
Taken from this comment by CoderChris
You could also try to install missed dependencies by this (though, it is said to not to solve the issue):
sudo yum install gcc-c++.noarch
Taken from this answer
Upvotes: 169
Reputation: 55
Why does this happen? When you install a fresh copy of linux, gcc compiler comes pre-packed with it. It only contains the files and binaries which are used to run the linux(to save space and time, obviously).
How to solve this error? All you need is to update your packages through the package manager and reinstall the build-essential packages. The commands might be different on different kernels.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 2567
In my rare case it was color wrapper
who spoiled gcc
. Solved by disabling cw
excluding its directory /usr/libexec/cw
from PATH
environmental variable.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 147
Just to complement @maxkoryukov's answer regarding Alpine.
The equivalent to Debian's build-essential
in Alpine is build-base
. In fact, the above mentioned alpine-sdk
depends on build-base
.
/ # apk info -R build-base
build-base-0.5-r1 depends on:
binutils
file
gcc
g++
make
libc-dev
fortify-headers
/ # apk info -R alpine-sdk
alpine-sdk-1.0-r0 depends on:
abuild
build-base
git
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 8207
This is because gcc
calls many other executables to complete the processing of the input, and cc1
is not in the included path.
On shell type whereis cc1
. If cc1
is found, it's better go ahead and create a softlink in the directory of gcc
; otherwise, cc1
is not installed and you have to install gcc-c++ using the package manager.
Upvotes: 28
Reputation: 416
I experienced this soon after compiling and installing a shiny new GCC — version 8.1 — on RHEL 7. In the end, it ended up being a permissions problem; my root umask was the culprit. I eventually found cc1
hiding in /usr/local/libexec
:
[root@nacelle gdb-8.1]# ls -l /usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.1.0/ | grep cc1
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 196481344 Jul 2 13:53 cc1
However, the permissions on the directories leading there didn't allow my standard user account:
[root@nacelle gdb-8.1]# ls -l /usr/local/libexec/
total 4
drwxr-x--- 3 root root 4096 Jul 2 13:53 gcc
[root@nacelle gdb-8.1]# ls -l /usr/local/libexec/gcc/
total 4
drwxr-x--- 3 root root 4096 Jul 2 13:53 x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
[root@nacelle gdb-8.1]# ls -l /usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/
total 4
drwxr-x--- 4 root root 4096 Jul 2 13:53 8.1.0
A quick recursive chmod
to add world read/execute permissions fixed it right up:
[root@nacelle 8.1.0]# cd /usr/local/libexec
[root@nacelle lib]# ls -l | grep gcc
drwxr-x--- 3 root root 4096 Jul 2 13:53 gcc
[root@nacelle lib]# chmod -R o+rx gcc
[root@nacelle lib]# ls -l | grep gcc
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jul 2 13:53 gcc
And now gcc
can find cc1
when I ask it to compile something!
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 50
Just to document my trouble with this issue even though it just appears to be a specific example of other answers; as a relative newbie I feel like this might help others.
Solution:
I added '/usr/bin' to the beginning of PATH for a single session using PATH='/usr/path/:$PATH'
and everything started to work fine.
I used gedit to update the PATH permanently, after ensuring it wouldn't break my regular toolchains.
Explanation:
I have multiple toolchains installed on Ubuntu 14.04LTS and I use just a couple on a regular basis. When I tried to use gcc from the command line I got the issue describe by the OP. '/usr/bin' is in the PATH but it is behind the other toolchain locations. Turns out the cc1 for those other toolchains is incompatible with gcc.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 43
On Scientific Linux 6 (similar to CentOS 6-- SL is now replaced by CentOS, AIUI), I had to use /usr/sbin/prelink -av -mR
which I found suggested at https://stelfox.net/blog/2014/08/dependency-prelink-issues/
Until I did that, I got a cc1 error gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory
when I tried to compile, and gcc --version reported 4.2.2 instead of 4.4.7, despite that version being reported by yum.
It may or may not be related, but the system had run out of space on /var
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 57804
I experienced this problem on a reasonably fresh install of Fedora 27. I tried all the other suggestions or their equivalents; installing the various packages either said "already installed" or installed something new which didn't help.
Fixed with
# dnf remove gcc
# dnf install gcc gcc-c++
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 23602
I fixed this problem by explicitly installing g++:
sudo apt-get install g++
Problem was encountered on Ubuntu 12.04 while installing pandas. (Thanks perilbrain.)
Upvotes: 15
Reputation: 3109
On debian / ubuntu I fixed this problem by reinstalling build-essential
:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install --reinstall build-essential
Upvotes: 74
Reputation: 2528
What helped for me was to use llvm-gcc
instead:
ln -s $(which llvm-gcc) /usr/local/bin/gcc
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 899
You can fix that by running this: On Fedora:
sudo dnf install redhat-rpm-config
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 131
This might also be the displayed error message if you try to run 32-bit gcc binaries on a 64-bit OS and missing 32-bit glibc. According to this readme: "For 64 bit system, 32 bit libc and libncurses are required to run the tools.". In this case there is no problem with the path and cc1 is actually found, but reported as missing as no 32 bit glibc.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 101
Make sure your GCC_EXEC_PREFIX(env)
is not exported and your PATH
is exported to right tool chain.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 252
I ran into a similar issue today - a co-worker could not build his software but I could build it. When he ran gcc
it could not find cc1
.
His executable path looked reasonable but the fact that I could not easily replicate the failure suggested something in his environment as the cause.
Eventually we found GCC_EXEC_PREFIX
defined in his environment which was the culprit and was misleading gcc
in the search for cc1
. This was part of his shell startup scripts and was meant to work around a limitation on a SPARC/Solaris system that is no longer in use. The problem was resolved by not setting this environment variable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Environment-Variables.html
Upvotes: 15