Scooter
Scooter

Reputation: 7059

Gcc error: gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory

I have been successfully using gcc on Linux Mint 12. Now I am getting an error. I have recently been doing some .so builds and installed Clang not to long ago, but have successfully compiled since both of those events, so not sure what has changed. I used the GUI Software Manager to remove and then install gcc again, but the results are the same:

~/code/c/ut: which gcc                                                                                                     
/usr/bin/gcc

~/code/c/ut: gcc -std=c99 -Wall -Wextra -g -c object.c                                                                      
gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory

Upvotes: 174

Views: 449409

Answers (27)

Kevin Chan
Kevin Chan

Reputation: 69

It's possible GCC_EXEC_PREFIX does some trick as well

gcc will find the executables, libraries, include files, and data files of the compiler itself via option -B or environment variable GCC_EXEC_PREFIX

Upvotes: 0

Alvin Smith
Alvin Smith

Reputation: 634

Just an example. You might find your cc1 installed on other places depends on whatever software was installed before.

find /usr/ -name "*cc1*"
# out:  /usr/share/terminfo/x/xterm+pcc1
# out:  /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.2/cc1
# out: /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.2/cc1plus
export PATH=$PATH:/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.2/

credit belong to programmerah

And of course, this is more from the Pen tester perspective. Please using proper method to resolve it like other answers mentioned.

Upvotes: 0

Renato Byrro
Renato Byrro

Reputation: 3804

Amazon Linux: fixing GCC issue

Since this comes up as the first result on Google, I just wanted to document my experience with Amazon Linux. Installing gcc-c++.noarch fixed the problem:

sudo yum install gcc-c++.noarch

Some people also reported this alternative as a solution (@CoderChris):

sudo yum install gcc72-c++

Others reported doing sudo yum install gcc first, then sudo yum install gcc-c++. (@Wilmer E. Henao, @Talha Anwar)

Upvotes: 20

Wilmer E. Henao
Wilmer E. Henao

Reputation: 4300

Adding my solution for Amazon Linux - Working in 2021:

sudo yum install gcc

and then:

sudo yum install gcc-c++

Upvotes: 4

dwto
dwto

Reputation: 807

For Amazon Linux Release 2 This will solve the issue:

sudo yum install gcc-c++

(This will not work: sudo yum install gcc72-c++)

Upvotes: 3

Pavel.Zh
Pavel.Zh

Reputation: 477

I would like to add some additional answer, for the ones who the most liked answer didn't help.

I accidentally deleted some of files in /usr/lib and /usr/local/bin so apt couldn't reinstall gcc and build-essential packages correctly. I've tried almost everything, but, at the end only restoring the whole dependency tree helped. On Ubuntu 20.04 I've run the following:

sudo apt install --reinstall \
    binutils \
    binutils-common \
    binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu \
    cpp \
    cpp-9 \
    gcc \
    gcc-10-base \
    gcc-9 \
    gcc-9-base \
    libasan5 \
    libatomic1 \
    libbinutils \
    libc-dev-bin \
    libc6 \
    libc6-dev \
    libcc1-0 \
    libcrypt-dev \
    libcrypt1 \
    libctf-nobfd0 \
    libctf0 \
    libgcc-9-dev \
    libgcc-s1 \
    libgmp10 \
    libgomp1 \
    libidn2-0 \
    libisl22 \
    libitm1 \
    liblsan0 \
    libmpc3 \
    libmpfr6 \
    libquadmath0 \
    libstdc++6 \
    libtsan0 \
    libubsan1 \
    libunistring2 \
    linux-libc-dev \
    manpages \
    manpages-dev \
    zlib1g

Upvotes: 1

k1000
k1000

Reputation: 175

Im my rare case the PATH variable was set but not exported. Simply exporting the PATH variable was solving this problem.

Upvotes: 1

Oplatek
Oplatek

Reputation: 358

Documenting another source of errors for installing gcc-10 on Amazon Linux 2 from source.

After running sudo make install and then testing gcc-10 I got this error:

gcc-10: fatal error: cannot execute ‘cc1’: execvp: No such file or directory

The reason was that the new g++ directories under /usr/local/ were created by sudo make install have 700 permissions so non-root users cannot see the directories content.

I fixed it by running

sudo find /usr/local/ -type d -exec chmod 755 {} \;

Note that I followed this snippet https://gist.github.com/nchaigne/ad06bc867f911a3c0d32939f1e930a11

Upvotes: -1

mksm
mksm

Reputation: 4553

Explanation

The error message told us, that the build-time dependency (in this case it is cc1) was not found, so all we need — install the appropriate package to the system (using package manager // from sources // another way)

What is cc1:

cc1 is the internal command which takes preprocessed C-language files and converts them to assembly. It's the actual part that compiles C. For C++, there's cc1plus, and other internal commands for different languages.

taken from this answer by Alan Shutko.

Solution for: Ubuntu / Linux Mint

sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install --reinstall build-essential

Solution for: Docker-alpine environment

If you are in docker-alpine environment install the build-base package by adding this to your Dockerfile:

RUN apk add build-base

Better package name provided by Pablo Castellano. More details here.

If you need more packages for building purposes, consider adding of the alpine-sdk package:

RUN apk add alpine-sdk

Taken from github

Solution for: CentOS/Fedora

This answer contains instructions for CentOS and Fedora Linux

Solution for: Amazon Linux

sudo yum install gcc72-c++

Taken from this comment by CoderChris

You could also try to install missed dependencies by this (though, it is said to not to solve the issue):

sudo yum install gcc-c++.noarch

Taken from this answer

Upvotes: 169

yoismak
yoismak

Reputation: 55

Why does this happen? When you install a fresh copy of linux, gcc compiler comes pre-packed with it. It only contains the files and binaries which are used to run the linux(to save space and time, obviously).

How to solve this error? All you need is to update your packages through the package manager and reinstall the build-essential packages. The commands might be different on different kernels.

Upvotes: 0

user3132194
user3132194

Reputation: 2567

In my rare case it was color wrapper who spoiled gcc. Solved by disabling cw excluding its directory /usr/libexec/cw from PATH environmental variable.

Upvotes: 0

olealgo
olealgo

Reputation: 479

It's in this package (Ubuntu 19.04):

  sudo apt install g++-6

Upvotes: -1

Pablo Castellano
Pablo Castellano

Reputation: 147

Just to complement @maxkoryukov's answer regarding Alpine.

The equivalent to Debian's build-essential in Alpine is build-base. In fact, the above mentioned alpine-sdk depends on build-base.

/ # apk info -R build-base
build-base-0.5-r1 depends on:
binutils
file
gcc
g++
make
libc-dev
fortify-headers

/ # apk info -R alpine-sdk
alpine-sdk-1.0-r0 depends on:
abuild
build-base
git

Upvotes: 3

perilbrain
perilbrain

Reputation: 8207

This is because gcc calls many other executables to complete the processing of the input, and cc1 is not in the included path.

On shell type whereis cc1. If cc1 is found, it's better go ahead and create a softlink in the directory of gcc; otherwise, cc1 is not installed and you have to install gcc-c++ using the package manager.

Upvotes: 28

jefe2000
jefe2000

Reputation: 416

I experienced this soon after compiling and installing a shiny new GCC — version 8.1 — on RHEL 7. In the end, it ended up being a permissions problem; my root umask was the culprit. I eventually found cc1 hiding in /usr/local/libexec:

[root@nacelle gdb-8.1]# ls -l /usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.1.0/ | grep cc1
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 196481344 Jul  2 13:53 cc1

However, the permissions on the directories leading there didn't allow my standard user account:

[root@nacelle gdb-8.1]# ls -l /usr/local/libexec/
total 4
drwxr-x--- 3 root root 4096 Jul  2 13:53 gcc
[root@nacelle gdb-8.1]# ls -l /usr/local/libexec/gcc/
total 4
drwxr-x--- 3 root root 4096 Jul  2 13:53 x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
[root@nacelle gdb-8.1]# ls -l /usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/
total 4
drwxr-x--- 4 root root 4096 Jul  2 13:53 8.1.0

A quick recursive chmod to add world read/execute permissions fixed it right up:

[root@nacelle 8.1.0]# cd /usr/local/libexec
[root@nacelle lib]# ls -l | grep gcc
drwxr-x---  3 root root     4096 Jul  2 13:53 gcc
[root@nacelle lib]# chmod -R o+rx gcc
[root@nacelle lib]# ls -l | grep gcc
drwxr-xr-x  3 root root     4096 Jul  2 13:53 gcc

And now gcc can find cc1 when I ask it to compile something!

Upvotes: 3

Antony Hatchkins
Antony Hatchkins

Reputation: 34064

On CentOS or Fedora

yum install gcc-c++ 

Upvotes: 105

J.Sunderland
J.Sunderland

Reputation: 50

Just to document my trouble with this issue even though it just appears to be a specific example of other answers; as a relative newbie I feel like this might help others.

Solution:

I added '/usr/bin' to the beginning of PATH for a single session using PATH='/usr/path/:$PATH' and everything started to work fine.

I used gedit to update the PATH permanently, after ensuring it wouldn't break my regular toolchains.

Explanation:

I have multiple toolchains installed on Ubuntu 14.04LTS and I use just a couple on a regular basis. When I tried to use gcc from the command line I got the issue describe by the OP. '/usr/bin' is in the PATH but it is behind the other toolchain locations. Turns out the cc1 for those other toolchains is incompatible with gcc.

Upvotes: 1

Russell Jones
Russell Jones

Reputation: 43

On Scientific Linux 6 (similar to CentOS 6-- SL is now replaced by CentOS, AIUI), I had to use /usr/sbin/prelink -av -mR which I found suggested at https://stelfox.net/blog/2014/08/dependency-prelink-issues/

Until I did that, I got a cc1 error gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory when I tried to compile, and gcc --version reported 4.2.2 instead of 4.4.7, despite that version being reported by yum.

It may or may not be related, but the system had run out of space on /var

Upvotes: 1

Suresh Ganta
Suresh Ganta

Reputation: 143

yum install gcc-c++ did the fix.

Upvotes: 9

wallyk
wallyk

Reputation: 57804

I experienced this problem on a reasonably fresh install of Fedora 27. I tried all the other suggestions or their equivalents; installing the various packages either said "already installed" or installed something new which didn't help.

Fixed with

# dnf remove gcc
# dnf install gcc gcc-c++

Upvotes: 1

Mark Chackerian
Mark Chackerian

Reputation: 23602

I fixed this problem by explicitly installing g++:

sudo apt-get install g++

Problem was encountered on Ubuntu 12.04 while installing pandas. (Thanks perilbrain.)

Upvotes: 15

mchid
mchid

Reputation: 3109

On debian / ubuntu I fixed this problem by reinstalling build-essential:

sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install --reinstall build-essential

Upvotes: 74

Alex
Alex

Reputation: 2528

What helped for me was to use llvm-gcc instead:

ln -s $(which llvm-gcc) /usr/local/bin/gcc

Upvotes: 1

victor sosa
victor sosa

Reputation: 899

You can fix that by running this: On Fedora:

sudo dnf install redhat-rpm-config

Upvotes: -1

sfrank
sfrank

Reputation: 131

This might also be the displayed error message if you try to run 32-bit gcc binaries on a 64-bit OS and missing 32-bit glibc. According to this readme: "For 64 bit system, 32 bit libc and libncurses are required to run the tools.". In this case there is no problem with the path and cc1 is actually found, but reported as missing as no 32 bit glibc.

Upvotes: 1

Vijay Nag
Vijay Nag

Reputation: 101

Make sure your GCC_EXEC_PREFIX(env) is not exported and your PATH is exported to right tool chain.

Upvotes: 5

deaks
deaks

Reputation: 252

I ran into a similar issue today - a co-worker could not build his software but I could build it. When he ran gcc it could not find cc1.

His executable path looked reasonable but the fact that I could not easily replicate the failure suggested something in his environment as the cause.

Eventually we found GCC_EXEC_PREFIX defined in his environment which was the culprit and was misleading gcc in the search for cc1. This was part of his shell startup scripts and was meant to work around a limitation on a SPARC/Solaris system that is no longer in use. The problem was resolved by not setting this environment variable.

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Environment-Variables.html

Upvotes: 15

Related Questions