Reputation: 1202
I have an array of ids
a1 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
and I have another array of objects with ids in random order
a2 = [(obj_with_id_5), (obj_with_id_2), (obj_with_id_1), (obj_with_id_3), (obj_with_id_4)]
Now I need to sort a2 according to the order of ids in a1. So a2 should now become:
[(obj_with_id_1), (id_2), (id_3), (id_4), (id_5)]
a1 might be [3, 2, 5, 4, 1] or in any order but a2 should correspond to the order of ids in a1.
I do like this:
a1.each_with_index do |id, idx|
found_idx = a1.find_index { |c| c.id == id }
replace_elem = a2[found_idx]
a2[found_idx] = a2[idx]
a2[idx] = replace_elem
end
But this still might run into an O(n^2) time if order of elements of a2 is exactly reverse of a1. Can someone please tell me the most efficient way of sorting a2?
Upvotes: 45
Views: 20527
Reputation: 48338
Inspired by Eric Woodruff's Answer, I came up with the following vanilla Ruby solution:
a2.group_by(&:object_id).values_at(*a1).flatten(1)
Method documentation:
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 6410
I like the accepted answer, but in ActiveSupport there is index_by which makes creating the initial hash even easier. See Cleanest way to create a Hash from an Array
In fact you could do this in one line since Enumerable supports index_by as well:
a2.index_by(&:id).values_at(*a1)
Upvotes: 20
Reputation: 54984
I'll be surprised if anything is much faster than the obvious way:
a2.sort_by{|x| a1.index x.id}
Upvotes: 88
Reputation: 21791
hash_object = objects.each_with_object({}) do |obj, hash|
hash[obj.object_id] = obj
end
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5].map { |index| hash_object[index] }
#=> array of objects in id's order
I believe that the run time will be O(n)
Upvotes: 27