Reputation: 48402
I have a Linq query which looks as follows:
return this._alarmObjectAlarmViolationList
.Where(row => row.ObjectId == subId)
.Where(row => row.AlarmInternalId == "WECO #1 (StdDev > UCL)")
.Where(row => row.PositionInSequence == row.SequenceCount)
.Any();
Is this functionaly any different, or any more or less efficient, than putting the Where predicates inside the Any() statement?
This is a Linq to Objects query.
Thank you.
Upvotes: 2
Views: 339
Reputation: 174309
No. There is no real difference in execution speed between .Where(predicate).Any()
and Any(predicate)
.
However, using only Any(predicate)
internally requires less objects to be created.
My suggestion is that you use the variant that is more readable. With many complicated predicates, I think it is easier to read when you use Where
- as in your sample.
Please note: My answer only applies to LINQ to Objects.
Upvotes: 6