Reputation: 9511
I want to keep some commits private on push, so I want that they get bundled into one big commit on the remote side. Locally they should remain splitted.
A use case is for example the work on a static blog. The draft steps should be commited and tracked locally but on push I want only publish released versions.
A solution in git and/or mercurial will be accepted.
Upvotes: 4
Views: 411
Reputation: 73788
In Mercurial 2.1 and later you can use phases to mark changesets as "secret". This will mark all outgoing changesets as secret:
$ hg phase -f --secret "outgoing()"
A secret changeset is not pushed or pulled by default, so after that command there wont be any outgoing changesets — adjust as needed to mark the right changesets as secret.
You also say you want the changesets as one big commit in the remote repository. For that you can use the histedit extension bundled with Mercurial 2.3 and later. Use the --keep
flag so that it wont remove the original changesets when you collapse them.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 1326782
The idea would be to make your commits on a dedicated branch, but to git merge --squash
them on master
(or any other public branch you intent to push), since it will produce one big commit.
You would then push master
on the remote repo.
See "In git, what is the difference between merge --squash
and rebase
?"
Upvotes: 4