Reputation: 995
I've been trying to implement BinaryTree class in Ruby, but I'm getting the stack level too deep
error, although I don't seem to be using any recursion in that particular piece of code:
1. class BinaryTree
2. include Enumerable
3.
4. attr_accessor :value
5.
6. def initialize( value = nil )
7. @value = value
8. @left = BinaryTree.new # stack level too deep here
9. @right = BinaryTree.new # and here
10. end
11.
12. def empty?
13. ( self.value == nil ) ? true : false
14. end
15.
16. def <<( value )
17. return self.value = value if self.empty?
18.
19. test = self.value <=> value
20. case test
21. when -1, 0
22. self.right << value
23. when 1
24. self.left << value
25. end
26. end # <<
27.
28. end
Edit: My question has gone a little bit off track. The current code setting gives me the stack level too deep
error at line 8. However, if I employ Ed S.'s solution
@left = @right = nil
then the <<
method complains saying: undefined method '<<' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)
at line 22.
Could anyone suggest how to resolve this? My idea is that if I could somehow tell the BinaryTree
class that variables left
and right
are of instances of BinaryTree
(i.e. their type is BinaryTree
) it would all be well. Am I wrong?
Upvotes: 7
Views: 8951
Reputation: 119
You might need to fix the infinite recursion in your code. Here's a working example of a binary tree. You need to have a base condition to terminate your recursion somewhere, else it'll be a stack of infinite depth.
Example of Self-Referential Data Structures - A Binary Tree
class TreeNode
attr_accessor :value, :left, :right
# The Tree node contains a value, and a pointer to two children - left and right
# Values lesser than this node will be inserted on its left
# Values greater than it will be inserted on its right
def initialize val, left, right
@value = val
@left = left
@right = right
end
end
class BinarySearchTree
# Initialize the Root Node
def initialize val
puts "Initializing with: " + val.to_s
@root = TreeNode.new(val, nil, nil)
end
# Pre-Order Traversal
def preOrderTraversal(node = @root)
return if (node == nil)
preOrderTraversal(node.left)
preOrderTraversal(node.right)
puts node.value.to_s
end
# Post-Order Traversal
def postOrderTraversal(node = @root)
return if (node == nil)
puts node.value.to_s
postOrderTraversal(node.left)
postOrderTraversal(node.right)
end
# In-Order Traversal : Displays the final output in sorted order
# Display smaller children first (by going left)
# Then display the value in the current node
# Then display the larger children on the right
def inOrderTraversal(node = @root)
return if (node == nil)
inOrderTraversal(node.left)
puts node.value.to_s
inOrderTraversal(node.right)
end
# Inserting a value
# When value > current node, go towards the right
# when value < current node, go towards the left
# when you hit a nil node, it means, the new node should be created there
# Duplicate values are not inserted in the tree
def insert(value)
puts "Inserting :" + value.to_s
current_node = @root
while nil != current_node
if (value < current_node.value) && (current_node.left == nil)
current_node.left = TreeNode.new(value, nil, nil)
elsif (value > current_node.value) && (current_node.right == nil)
current_node.right = TreeNode.new(value, nil, nil)
elsif (value < current_node.value)
current_node = current_node.left
elsif (value > current_node.value)
current_node = current_node.right
else
return
end
end
end
end
bst = BinarySearchTree.new(10)
bst.insert(11)
bst.insert(9)
bst.insert(5)
bst.insert(7)
bst.insert(18)
bst.insert(17)
# Demonstrating Different Kinds of Traversals
puts "In-Order Traversal:"
bst.inOrderTraversal
puts "Pre-Order Traversal:"
bst.preOrderTraversal
puts "Post-Order Traversal:"
bst.postOrderTraversal
=begin
Output :
Initializing with: 10
Inserting :11
Inserting :9
Inserting :5
Inserting :7
Inserting :18
Inserting :17
In-Order Traversal:
5
7
9
10
11
17
18
Pre-Order Traversal:
7
5
9
17
18
11
10
Post-Order Traversal:
10
9
5
7
11
18
17
=end
Ref: http://www.thelearningpoint.net/computer-science/basic-data-structures-in-ruby---binary-search-tre
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1392
@pranshantb1984 - The ref you gave is good one but I think there is a small change in code. Need to update PreOrder and PostOrder code as given below
# Post-Order Traversal
def postOrderTraversal(node= @root)
return if (node == nil)
postOrderTraversal(node.left)
postOrderTraversal(node.right)
puts node.value.to_s
end
# Pre-Order Traversal
def preOrderTraversal(node = @root)
return if (node == nil)
puts node.value.to_s
preOrderTraversal(node.left)
preOrderTraversal(node.right)
end
Pre Order Traversal
10 -> 9 -> 5 -> 7 -> 11 -> 18 -> 17
Post Order Traversal
7 -> 5 -> 9 -> 17 -> 18 -> 11 -> 10
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 995
1. class BinaryTree
2. include Enumerable
3.
4. attr_accessor :value
5.
6. def initialize( value = nil )
7. @value = value
8. end
9.
10. def each # visit
11. return if self.nil?
12.
13. yield self.value
14. self.left.each( &block ) if self.left
15. self.right.each( &block ) if self.right
16. end
17.
18. def empty?
19. # code here
20. end
21.
22. def <<( value ) # insert
23. return self.value = value if self.value == nil
24.
25. test = self.value <=> value
26. case test
27. when -1, 0
28. @right = BinaryTree.new if self.value == nil
29. self.right << value
30. when 1
31. @left = BinaryTree.new if self.value == nil
32. self.left << value
33. end
34. end # <<
35. end
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 124642
although I don't seem to be using any recursion in that particular piece of code:
Yet...
def initialize( value = nil )
@value = value
@left = BinaryTree.new # this calls initialize again
@right = BinaryTree.new # and so does this, but you never get there
end
That is infinite recursion. You call initilize
, which in turn calls new
, which in turn calls initialize
... and around we go.
You need to add a guard in there to detect that you have already initialized the main node and are now initializing leafs, in which case, @left
and @right
should just be set to nil
.
def initialize( value=nil, is_sub_node=false )
@value = value
@left = is_sub_node ? nil : BinaryTree.new(nil, true)
@right = is_sub_node ? nil : BinaryTree.new(nil, true)
end
To be honest though... why aren't you just initializing left and right to nil to begin with? They don't have values yet, so what are you gaining? It makes more sense semantically; you create a new list with one element, i.e., elements left and right don't yet exist. I would just use:
def initialize(value=nil)
@value = value
@left = @right = nil
end
Upvotes: 13