CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javascriptjqueryfunctiontypeof
Aust
Aust

Reputation: 11602

What's the difference between (typeof variable === "function") and jQuery.isFunction()?

I have always used (typeof variable === "function") and I stumbled across jQuery.isFunction() and I was wondering:

  1. What is the difference between the typeof method and jQuery's method? And not only what the difference is, but
  2. When is it appropriate to use the typeof method and when is it appropriate to use jQuery's method?

Upvotes: 8

Views: 20147

Answers (5)

Yuan Yuan
Yuan Yuan

Reputation: 21

Usually you can test whether JS object is function by using this test:

(typeof fn === 'function')

However, this doesn't always work (IE8):

typeof alert => 'object'
typeof document.createElement('input').getAttribute => 'object'

Before jQuery 1.4 internally they used the same check, but now they've fixed it. So to be sure that passed object is a function which can be called, just use $.isFunction method:

$.isFunction(function() {}) => true
$.isFunction(alert) => true
$.isFunction(document.createElement('input').getAttribute) => true

Copied from this blog: http://nuald.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/why-jqueryisfunction.html

Upvotes: 2

JohnB
JohnB

Reputation: 13713

The jQuery source code for isFunction is

isFunction: function( obj ) {
    return jQuery.type(obj) === "function";
},

type: function( obj ) {
return obj == null ?
   String( obj ) :
   class2type[ core_toString.call(obj) ] || "object";
},

//...

jQuery.each("Boolean Number String Function Array Date RegExp Object".split(" "),
   function(i, name) {
      class2type[ "[object " + name + "]" ] = name.toLowerCase();
});

core_toString = Object.prototype.toString,

hence jQuery.isFunction returns true if and only if calling Object.prototype.toString.call on its argument returns [object Function].

Upvotes: 2

David G
David G

Reputation: 96810

There's no difference. jQuery uses the same concept:

// ...
isFunction: function( obj ) {
    return jQuery.type(obj) === "function";
}

Update:

After digging in deeper I found that jQuery's isFunction method is comparing the toString method of the Object.prototype chain on function() {}, to the string [object Function]. This is the how it differs from your former example and the reason for it being slower than typeof.

Upvotes: 4

Lusitanian
Lusitanian

Reputation: 11122

There is almost no difference, other than that using jQuery is slightly slower. See the source code:

isFunction: function( obj ) {
    return jQuery.type(obj) === "function";
},

which calls a function which calls another function to determine the exact same thing as what you showed :P

There is literally no advantage to jQuery in this case [or for that manner, 90% of the use-cases of the library]. Look into Vanilla-JS and check out some of its features :P

TLDR: Don't use jQuery for this...or anything.

UPDATE

Here's a benchmark showing you that Vanilla JS is roughly 93% faster than jQuery: http://jsperf.com/jquery-isfunction-vs-vanilla-is-function.

Upvotes: 11

Greg Ross
Greg Ross

Reputation: 3498

The difference is that JQuery calls something equivalent to the following and checks for the "Function" string token:

var toString = Object.prototype.toString;
var func = function(){};

console.log(toString.call(func)); // "returns [object Function]"

Whereas typof, just returns "function":

var fType = typeof func; 

console.log(fType); // returns "function"

Here's an example.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions