Reputation: 358
I am developing a toy data access mechanism in Java 6 (and above). Each model class should have a findById
static method that should instantiate an object from the row with the specified id. I have come up with the approach displayed below. Is my approach considered good practice? If not, what could be improved?
The database (MySQL) bootstrap script:
create database test;
create user test identified by 'test';
grant all on test.* to test;
use test;
create table products(id integer,name varchar(10));
insert into products values(1,'led');
The source code:
import java.sql.*;
class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) throws SQLException, ClassNotFoundException {
Class.forName("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver");
Product p = Product.findById(1);
System.out.println(p.id + " " + p.name);
}
}
class Database {
static <T extends Model<T>> T findById(T m, String sql, int id) throws SQLException {
try (Connection conn = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:mysql:///test", "test", "test");
PreparedStatement stmt = conn.prepareStatement(sql)) {
stmt.setInt(1, id);
try (ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery()) {
rs.next();
m.load(rs);
}
}
return m;
}
}
abstract class Model<T> {
abstract void load(ResultSet rs) throws SQLException;
}
class Product extends Model<Product> {
int id;
String name;
static Product findById(int id) throws SQLException {
return Database.findById(new Product(), "select * from products where id=?", id);
}
@Override
void load(ResultSet rs) throws SQLException {
this.id = rs.getInt("id");
this.name = rs.getString("name");
}
}
Upvotes: 1
Views: 4147
Reputation: 66166
I'd rather use DAO based approach. You'll need to create one GenericDao<T>
class with basic CRUD methods, and all derived DAO classes will have CRUD capabilities out of the box for specified entity class.
Here're two articles which demonstrate the described technique: http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/251166/The-Generic-DAO-pattern-in-Java-with-Spring-3-and http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-genericdao/index.html
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 4598
I like the basic design. But for a real production project I would make 3 changes:
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 22822
You are mixing concerns and responsibility, introducing tight coupling between your entities (Product
) and your data-access layer.
You should separate
ProductDao
) with the methods you want to execute to retrieve / store / delete your entities. Then you can have concrete implementations of these using your chosen technology (JDBC in your case). So if later you want to change your data access tech, you can have another implementation of these (JdbcProductDao
and HibernateProductDao
) for example.You may even want to go one step further, and dissociate the DAO layer from the actual repository layer, but that could be seen as premature optimisation, depending on the number of different entity classes you have in your system.
That has many benefits:
Also, it's not necessarily a good idea to try to have generic methods everywhere: usually you'll find the findById
you want is slightly different for each of your entities, and some of them don't fit the generic method you described in Database
(I'm not even mentioning it's a static method, which is a bad smell). In my current team, we use the rule of three: introduce refactored generic classes / method only when you're writing the 3rd elements of your system that would benefit from it. Else we consider it premature optimisation.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 8969
You are reinventing Object Relational Mapping (ORM) and Data Access Object (DAO) methodologies. There exist many Java libraries which do exactly what you are trying to do here, for example Hibernate. I think you may find this library more useful than getting the right answer to this question.
Upvotes: 0