user1154644
user1154644

Reputation: 4609

Storing a dictionary in a hashtable

I have an assignment that I am working on, and I can't get a hold of the professor to get clarity on something. The idea is that we are writing an anagram solver, using a given set of words, that we store in 3 different dictionary classes: Linear, Binary, and Hash.

So we read in the words from a textfile, and for the first 2 dictionary objects(linear and binary), we store the words as an ArrayList...easy enough.

But for the HashDictionary, he want's us to store the words in a HashTable. I'm just not sure what the values are going to be for the HashTable, or why you would do that. The instructions say we store the words in a Hashtable for quick retrieval, but I just don't get what the point of that is. Makes sense to store words in an arraylist, but I'm just not sure of how key/value pairing helps with a dictionary.

Maybe i'm not giving enough details, but I figured maybe someone would have seen something like this and its obvious to them.

Each of our classes has a contains method, that returns a boolean representing whether or not a word passed in is in the dictionary, so the linear does a linear search of the arraylist, the binary does a binary search of the arraylist, and I'm not sure about the hash....

Upvotes: 1

Views: 12029

Answers (3)

cheeken
cheeken

Reputation: 34655

The difference is speed. Both methods work, but the hash table is fast.

When you use an ArrayList, or any sort of List, to find an element, you must inspect each list item, one by one, until you find the desired word. If the word isn't there, you've looped through the entire list.

When you use a HashTable, you perform some "magic" on the word you are looking up known as calculating the word's hash. Using that hash value, instead of looping through a list of values, you can immediately deduce where to find your word - or, if your word doesn't exist in the hash, that your word isn't there.

I've oversimplified here, but that's the general idea. You can find another question here with a variety of explanations on how a hash table works.

Here is a small code snippet utilizing a HashMap.

// We will map our words to their definitions; word is the key, definition is the value
Map<String, String> dictionary = new HashMap<String, String>();
map.put("hello","A common salutation");
map.put("chicken","A delightful vessel for protein");

// Later ...
map.get("chicken"); // Returns "A delightful vessel for protein"; 

The problem you describe asks that you use a HashMap as the basis for a dictionary that fulfills three requirements:

  • Adding a word to the dictionary
  • Removing a word from the dictionary
  • Checking if a word is in the dictionary

It seems counter-intuitive to use a map, which stores a key and a value, since all you really want to is store just a key (or just a value). However, as I described above, a HashMap makes it extremely quick to find the value associated with a key. Similarly, it makes it extremely quick to see if the HashMap knows about a key at all. We can leverage this quality by storing each of the dictionary words as a key in the HashMap, and associating it with a garbage value (since we don't care about it), such as null.

You can see how to fulfill the three requirements, as follows.

Map<String, Object> map = new HashMap<String, Object>();
// Add a word
map.put('word', null);

// Remove a word
map.remove('word');

// Check for the presence of a word
map.containsKey('word');

I don't want to overload you with information, but the requirements we have here align with a data structure known as a Set. In Java, a commonly used Set is the HashSet, which is almost exactly what you are implementing with this bit of your homework assignment. (In fact, if this weren't a homework assignment explicitly instructing you to use a HashMap, I'd recommend you instead use a HashSet.)

Upvotes: 7

djechlin
djechlin

Reputation: 60758

Arrays are hard to find stuff in. If I gave you array[0] = "cat"; array[1] = "dog"; array[2] = "pikachu";, you'd have to check each element just to know if jigglypuff is a word. If I gave you hash["cat"] = 1; hash["dog"] = 1; hash["pikachu"] = 1;", instant to do this in, you just look it up directly. The value 1 doesn't matter in this particular case although you can put useful information there, such as how many times youv'e looked up a word, or maybe 1 will mean real word and 2 will mean name of a Pokemon, or for a real dictionary it could contain a sentence-long definition. Less relevant.

Upvotes: 2

paddy
paddy

Reputation: 63471

It sounds like you don't really understand hash tables then. Even Wikipedia has a good explanation of this data structure.

Your hash table is just going to be a large array of strings (initially all empty). You compute a hash value using the characters in your word, and then insert the word at that position in the table.

There are issues when the hash value for two words is the same. And there are a few solutions. One is to store a list at each array position and just shove the word onto that list. Another is to step through the table by a known amount until you find a free position. Another is to compute a secondary hash using a different algorithm.

The point of this is that hash lookup is fast. It's very quick to compute a hash value, and then all you have to do is check that the word at that array position exists (and matches the search word). You follow the same rules for hash value collisions (in this case, mismatches) that you used for the insertion.

You want your table size to be a prime number that is larger than the number of elements you intend to store. You also need a hash function that diverges quickly so that your data is more likely to be dispersed widely through your hash table (rather than being clustered heavily in one region).

Hope this is a help and points you in the right direction.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions