CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#.netregexstringperformance
Chris Phillips
Chris Phillips

Reputation: 12387

Why are C# compiled regular expressions faster than equivalent string methods?

Every time I have to do simple containment or replacement operations on strings, where the term that I'm searching for is a fixed value, I find that if I take my sample input and do some profiling on it, using a compiled regular expression is nearly* always faster than using the equivalent method from the String class.

I've tried comparing a variety of methods ( hs is the "haystack" to search, ndl is the "needle" to search for, repl is the replacement value. regex is always created with the RegexOptions.Compiled option ):

I've found quite a few discussions focusing on which of the two techniques are faster (1, 2, 3, and loads of others), but those discussions always seem to focus on:

  1. Use the string version for simple operations and regex for complex operations (which, from a raw performance perspective, doesn't even seem to be necessarily a good idea), or
  2. Run a test and compare the two ( and for equivalent tests, the regex version seems to always perform better ).

I don't understand how this can possibly be the case: how does the regex engine compare any two strings for substring matches faster than the equivalent string version? This seems to hold true for search spaces that are very small or very large, or search terms that are small or large, or whether the search term occurs early or late in the search space.

So, why are regular expressions faster?

* In fact, the only case I've managed to show that the string version is faster than a compiled regex is when searching an empty string! Any other case, from single character strings to very long strings are processed faster by a compiled regex than the equivalent string method.

Update: Added a clause to clarify that I'm looking at cases where the search term is known at compile time. For dynamic or one-time operations, the overhead of compiling the regular expression will tend to skew the results in favor of the string methods.

Upvotes: 18

Views: 6471

Answers (3)

Steve Wortham
Steve Wortham

Reputation: 22220

From my own experience, whenever I've benchmarked regex solutions vs custom parsers with simple string operations, the regex solution is a bit slower. That's because they often suffer from backtracking.

But out of curiosity I wrote a little test to see if what you say really is true in the simplest of examples.

Here's my test...

    private static Regex RegexSearch = new Regex("Audi A4", RegexOptions.Compiled);

    static void Main(string[] args)
    {            
        // warm up the JIT compiler
        FoundWithRegexIsMatch();
        FoundWithStringContains();
        FoundWithStringIndexOf();
        // done warming up

        int iterations = 100;
        var sw = new Stopwatch();

        sw.Restart();
        for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
        {
            FoundWithRegexIsMatch();
        }
        sw.Stop();
        Console.WriteLine("Regex.IsMatch: " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds + " ms");


        sw.Restart();
        for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
        {
            FoundWithStringIndexOf();
        }
        sw.Stop();
        Console.WriteLine("String.IndexOf: " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds + " ms");


        sw.Restart();
        for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
        {
            FoundWithStringContains();
        }
        sw.Stop();
        Console.WriteLine("String.Contains: " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds + " ms");
    }

    private static bool FoundWithStringContains()
    {
        return Resource2.csv.Contains("Audi A4");
    }

    private static bool FoundWithStringIndexOf()
    {
        return Resource2.csv.IndexOf("Audi A4") >= 0;
    }

    private static bool FoundWithRegexIsMatch()
    {
        return RegexSearch.IsMatch(Resource2.csv);
    }

I'm testing against a CSV file I have which is about 1.2 MB. And here are the results:

  • Regex.IsMatch: 172 ms
  • String.IndexOf: 172 ms
  • String.Contains: 185 ms

Indeed you are correct. When you're not doing anything fancy in the regular expression, the regular expression is a bit faster than a String.Contains operation. However, I found that there's a tiny bit of overhead in String.Contains and calling String.IndexOf is faster and actually matches the time of Regex.IsMatch to the millisecond.

These identical timings are suspicious. I wonder if during compilation it's determined that this doesn't actually need to go through the Regex engine (since there are no regex-specific instructions in the pattern I used above). Instead it may be simplified so that Regex.IsMatch makes the same call to FindNLSString from kernel32.dll as IndexOf does. That's just a guess.

Upvotes: 1

Niki
Niki

Reputation: 15867

I don't understand how this can possibly be the case: how does the regex engine compare any two strings for substring matches faster than the equivalent string version?

I can think of two reasons:

  1. The regex is using some smart algorithm like Boyer Moore (O(M/N)) while the simple string operation simply compares the needle to each position in the haystack (O(N*M)).
  2. They're not really doing the same thing. For example, one might do culture-invariant matching while the other does culture-dependent matching, which might make a performance difference.

Upvotes: 14

Erre Efe
Erre Efe

Reputation: 15557

As the Base Class Library team wrote:

In [the case of RegexOptions.Compiled], we first do the work to parse into opcodes. Then we also do more work to turn those opcodes into actual IL using Reflection.Emit. As you can imagine, this mode trades increased startup time for quicker runtime: in practice, compilation takes about an order of magnitude longer to startup, but yields 30% better runtime performance.

But, you're overloking one important thing: Pattern is fixed. Be aware that this isn't always the case. You can't change it at runtime! There will be cases in which flexibility will go down for more than the 30% of the performance gain.

Upvotes: 6

Related Questions