Reputation: 93
I have a Backbone view (see below) that I believe to be doing the right thing
Index = Backbone.View.extend({
render: function() {
var activities = new Activities();
activities.fetch();
var tpl = Handlebars.compile($("#activities-template").html());
$(this.el).html(tpl({activities: activities.toJSON()}));
return this;
}
});
If execute each line in the render() function with Chrome JS console I get the expected result with the element I pass in getting populated with the template output. However, when I run this using the following
var i = new Index({el: $("body")})
i.render()
"i.$el" is completely empty--the HTML is not getting rendered like it does in console. Any ideas why?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 6344
Reputation: 434665
fetch
is an AJAX call so there's no guarantee that activities.toJSON()
will give you any data when you do this:
activities.fetch();
var tpl = Handlebars.compile($("#activities-template").html());
$(this.el).html(tpl({activities: activities.toJSON()}));
Executing the code in the console probably gives the AJAX call time to return with something before you try to use activities
.
You should do two things:
activities
is empty.Attach your view's render
to the collection's "reset"
event:
initialize: function() {
// Or, more commonly, create the collection outside the view
// and say `new View({ collection: ... })`
this.collection = new Activities();
this.collection.on('reset', this.render, this);
this.collection.fetch();
},
render: function() {
var tpl = Handlebars.compile($("#activities-template").html());
this.$el.html(tpl({activities: this.collection.toJSON()}));
return this;
}
I also switched to this.$el
, there's no need to $(this.el)
when Backbone already gives you this.$el
.
Upvotes: 3