CODEWITHSUNDEEP
hibernatelucenehibernate-search
Steve Perkins
Steve Perkins

Reputation: 11870

Can Hibernate Search implement a Lucene FullTextFilter using embedded collection fields?

I have a Hibernate Search entity class that looks something like this:

@Entity
@Indexed
@FullTextFilterDefs({
   @FullTextFilterDef(name="myFilter", impl=MyFilterFactory.class)
})
public class Parent {
   ...
   @Column
   @Field
   private String name;

   @ManyToMany
   @IndexedEmbedded
   private Set<Child> children;
   ...
}

The associated enity is likewise straightforward:

@Entity
@Indexed
public class Child {
   ...
   @Column
   @Field
   private String name;

   @ManyToMany(mappedBy="children")
   @ContainedIn
   private Set<Parent> parents;
   ...
}

If the MyFilterFactory.getFilter() method is working with a simple field of Parent like this (hardcoded for easier illustration):

...
Term term = new Term("name", "daddy");
Query query = new TermQuery(term);
return new CachingWrapperFilter( new QueryWrapperFilter(query) );
...

... then FullTextQuery's with this filter enabled work as expected.

However, if I change the filter to use a field of an embedded field:

...
Term term = new Term("children.name", "Junior");
Query query = new TermQuery(term);
return new CachingWrapperFilter( new QueryWrapperFilter(query) );
...

... then I get 0 hits every time, despite the fact that the search expression children.name:parent=junior works just fine in Luke.

Is there something I am missing here? Obviously the information is there since I can search it in Luke. Is there something special you have to do with Hibernate Search to implement a FullTextFilter against an embedded field like this, rather than a simple field?

Upvotes: 0

Views: 990

Answers (1)

Steve Perkins
Steve Perkins

Reputation: 11870

While putting together a simple unit test with which to submit a bug ticket, I discovered the real issue. The problem is not a matter of simple fields vs. complex fields. The problem was a frustratingly-silly misunderstanding about capitalization.

Normally when Hibernate Search builds a Lucene index, the standard analyzer converts all the field values to lower-case. When you mostly use the Hibernate Search DSL for queries, you get accustomed to case-insensitivity. However, when you query using the Lucene API directly, you are responsible for making your search terms lower-case to match the index.

The behavior that I originally saw was due to the case of my search terms. When I filtered on a simple field, I happened to be using an all-lowercase string. When I filtered on a complex field, I happened to be using a string with a capital letter.

After making sure that the filter parameter is converted to lower-case, the problem was resolved.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions