Reputation: 158191
If I have these two methods
public Foo Get(string bar) { ... }
public Foo Get(int bar) { ... }
And write this piece of xml documentation on a different method
/// <summary>
/// Has a close relation to the <see cref="Get"/> methods.
/// </summary>
I get a blue squiggly under Get
, saying that it is an Ambiguous reference 'Get'. which is true, but I want it to reference both. What is the correct way of doing this? Or should am I only supposed to reference a single method overload?
Upvotes: 33
Views: 4651
Reputation: 7097
Here's an updated answer to this old question. I'm not sure when this became valid because there isn't much documentation out there. If you prefix a cref
attribute with "o:..."
such as in "o:myMethod()"
it will link to the overload section and cover all of the overloads of that method. Using Daniel Elliott's answer's example:
/// Has a close relation to the <see cref="o:Get()"/> methods.
This will also remove warnings from Intellisense / Resharper about ambiguous references.
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 22867
Try
/// Has a close relation to the <see cref="Get(string)"/>
/// and <see cref="Get(int)" /> methods.
You may need full typenames but intellisense should help as soon as you put first bracket in.
Hope that helps,
Dan
Upvotes: 31