Reputation: 2824
This code compiles fine but give segmentation fault error while running? Can anyone tell why?
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <math.h>
int main() {
const char s2[] = "asdfasdf";
char* s1;
strcpy(s1, s2);
printf("%s", s1);
return 0;
}
Upvotes: 3
Views: 1186
Reputation: 561
You have to allocate memory to the pointer s1. If you don't do that, it will be pointing somewhere unknown, and thus arriving at the segmentation fault. The correct code should be:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <math.h>
int main() {
const char s2[] = "asdfasdf";
char* s1 = malloc(21 * sizeof(s2[0]));
strcpy(s1,s2);
printf("%s",s1);
return 0;
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 64700
No one yet has pointed out the potential of strdup (String Duplicate) to address this problem.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <math.h>
using namespace std;
int main() {
const char s2[] = "asdfasdf";
char* s1;
s1 = strdup(s2); // Allocates memory, must be freed later.
printf("%s", s1);
free(s1); // Allocated in strdup, 2 lines above
return 0;
}
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 12914
What they all said, you need to allocate the space for s1. What everyone else has posted will work just fine, however, if you want a simpler way to allocate space for an existing string and copy it into a new pointer then use strdup like this:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <math.h>
using namespace std;
int main() {
const char s2[] = "asdfasdf";
char* s1;
s1 = strdup(s2);
printf("%s", s1);
return 0;
}
Someone mentioned strdup earlier, that would be a way to use it. Most systems should support it since it is in the standard C libaries. But apparently some don't. So if it returns an error either write your own using the method already mentioned, or just use the method already mentioned ;)
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 23321
You allocated space for a single pointer, s1
, but not the bytes pointed at by s1
.
A solution is to dynamically allocate memory for s1
:
s1 = (char *)malloc(strlen(s2) + 1);
strcpy(s1, s2);
Keep in mind that you need to allocate one more byte of memory (the +1 in the call to malloc
) than the number of characters in s2
because there is an implicit NULL
byte at the end.
See C Memory Management (Stack Overflow) for more information.
Upvotes: 13
Reputation: 5733
You didn't allocate memory for s1. You have a pointer to s1 but no memory allocated for the strcpy to copy the value of s2 into.
char *s1 = malloc( strlen(s2) + 1 );
strcpy( s1, s2 );
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 76710
You have not allocated any memory to s1. It is a pointer to nothing.
char* s1 = malloc(sizeof(s2));
strcpy(s1, s2);
printf("%s", s1);
free(s1);
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 9801
The problem is that s1 does not have any memory associated with it. strcpy
does not call malloc()
.
You could either do:
char s1[10];
or
char *s1 = malloc(10);
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 52314
You need to allocate the destination (and using namespace std;
isn't C but C++, the rest of the code is C).
Upvotes: 1