CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javastatic-initializerentry-point
Everyone
Everyone

Reputation: 2376

What benefits does main(...) provide over using a static-initializer as a pseudo entry-point?

The entry point into a program in java is typically something like this 


    // MyMain.java
    public class MyMain{  
      //whatever 
        public static void main(String args[]){ 
        System.out.println("balderdash");
        }
    }

However, since there is only the one SOP in main, the above class may be like this instead


    // MyMain.java
    public class MyMain{
        //whatever
        static {    
        System.out.println("balderdash");
        }
    }

One obvious advantage to using main(...) is that arguments may be passed in to the program. Another ( I'm guessing here ) may have to do with the garbage collecter treating objects created within a static block differently.

What other benefits come from using the language-defined entry-point - public static void main( String args[] ) instead of using a static initializer.

p.s. The above snippets are for illustration only, and may not be compilable

Upvotes: 2

Views: 460

Answers (6)

Tadeusz Kopec for Ukraine
Tadeusz Kopec for Ukraine

Reputation: 12413

If you don't have any entry point, you cannot run anything. If you have many entry points (many main methods), user who starts your application controls which will be run by command line.
On the other hand static initialization blocks are executed when class is loaded. Controlling which class is loaded and the order of class loading (and of executing their static initialization blocks) is much harder to control. That's enough reason not to put to much logic to static initialization blocks. You make something harder to read and understand and in reward you receive something harder to use.

Upvotes: 0

Powerlord
Powerlord

Reputation: 88806

OK, I'll admit that I haven't tried it with a static initialized class, but wouldn't typing

java StaticInitializedClass

on the command line print out

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: main

since it doesn't have a main(String[]) method?

Upvotes: 2

Ben
Ben

Reputation: 2801

Let's not forget about maintainability. When someone else goes to change your code they are always going to look for a main() method to start the program. Unless there is some reason you can't get around (and I'm guessing there is not) then I would just use the main method.

Upvotes: 1

Aaron Digulla
Aaron Digulla

Reputation: 328744

The main reason why it's better to use main() is that you can have several main methods in your application (in different classes). If you load a class, main() isn't executed automatically while static code blocks are always executed exactly once at the first time a class is loaded and there is no way to prevent that.

Upvotes: 2

Jon Skeet
Jon Skeet

Reputation: 1502226

  • You can test it or call it from other applications.
  • It's what other people will expect.
  • If you execute your whole application in the context of a static initializer, I suspect you'll effectively be holding a lock on that type for the whole time. If any other thread tries to call a static method in the same class, it will block. That's the sort of problem you get when you try to use a concept in an unexpected way - it's just conceptually "wrong". Initializing the class simply isn't the same as running an application.

EDIT: Here's an example of that problem:

class SampleTask implements Runnable
{
    public void run()
    {
        System.out.println("Calling someStaticMethod");
        Test.someStaticMethod();
        System.out.println("someStaticMethod returned");
    }
}

public class Test
{
    static
    {
        System.out.println("Starting new thread...");
        new Thread(new SampleTask()).start();
        System.out.println("Thread started. Sleeping");
        try
        {
            Thread.sleep(5000);
        }
        catch (InterruptedException e)
        {
            System.out.println("Interrupted!");
        }
        System.out.println("Finished sleeping");          
    }

    public static void someStaticMethod()
    {
        System.out.println("In someStaticMethod");
    }

    public static void main(String[] args)
    {
        System.out.println("In main. Sleeping again.");
        try
        {
            Thread.sleep(5000);
        }
        catch (InterruptedException e)
        {
            System.out.println("Interrupted!");
        }
    }
}

Output:

Starting new thread...
Thread started. Sleeping
Calling someStaticMethod
Finished sleeping
In someStaticMethod
someStaticMethod returned
In main. Sleeping again.

Note how the call to someStaticMethod from the new thread has to wait until the static initializer has finished before it gets to run.

Upvotes: 6

banjollity
banjollity

Reputation: 4540

You can call main() for other objects from anywhere else in your code as many times as you want. A static initializer is only going to ever run once. Also, you can pass parameters from the command line into main().

Two big plusses for main() in my book.

Upvotes: 5

Related Questions