CODEWITHSUNDEEP
cassemblynasm
Weigel Gram
Weigel Gram

Reputation: 183

executing assembly code in c

I want to know if there is a way of calling in a .c assembly code? I want to put this code in my .c file

The assembly code i want to execute in .c file to return the address

1. mov eax, 0x2d
2. mov ebx, 0
3. int 0x80

I know the answer is put eax.

This is the part of .c file:

1. void function(void)
2. {
3. void *sp;
4. sp = eax;
5. fprintf(stderr, "system break:   %p\n", sp);
6. }

How can I do it?

Upvotes: 3

Views: 22195

Answers (5)

Frank Kotler
Frank Kotler

Reputation: 1452

You really need to "put" asm source in Nasm syntax "in" your C source program? Fergedit. lcc maybe... If you want to "execute" your asm program from your C program...

    global getbrk
    section .text
    getbrk:
        push ebx ; C likes it saved
        mov eax, 45 ; __NR_brk
        xor ebx, ebx ; get current break
        int 80h
        pop ebx
        ret

assemble nasm -f elf getbrk.asm, put sp=getbrk(); in your C file, compile gcc -m32 -O3 -o myprog myprog.c getbrk.o

Or just sp=sbrk(0); in your C program and skip the asm... won't be any more portable than doing it with int 80h. (but what fun would that be?) :)

Upvotes: 2

Weigel Gram
Weigel Gram

Reputation: 183

void function(void){

   void *sp
   __asm__ volatile(
   "movl $0x2d, %%eax;"
   "movl $0, %%ebx;"
   "int $0x80"
   :"=a"(sp)
   :
   :"%ebx"
   );

   fprintf(stderr, "system break: %p\n",sp);
   }

This is my answer :)

Upvotes: 2

user4815162342
user4815162342

Reputation: 155376

The ability to do this is compiler-specific. Gcc allows this using its asm keyword extension, while Visual studio implements a different extension.

Note that, beside the obvious problem with non-portability to other architectures, including any inline assembly can reduce performance because the compiler is unable to analyze the assembly to determine whether it's side-effect-free, safe for inlining, whether it accesses global resources, and so on.

Upvotes: 9

Aki Suihkonen
Aki Suihkonen

Reputation: 20037

Another method if e.g. using gcc, is to first compile some very trivial function without optimizations:

int foo(int a, int b) {
  return a+(b<<3);
}

with gcc -S foo.c

and use the foo.s as template. One can later compile and link those files with gcc main.c foo.s (and be sure to delete the foo.c file / rename foo.s to something else)

From that particular function one can observe, where the compiler puts the result and in which addresses or registers the compiler puts the first and second arguments.

It's slightly faster approach than learning asm-templates with read,write, clobber lists.

Upvotes: 3

user529758
user529758

Reputation:

Some compilers implement the __asm__ or asm keywords as an extension to the C language:

__asm__(
    "mov eax, 0x2d\n"
    "mov ebx, 0\n"
    "int 0x80\n"
);

The code in parentheses will be copied verbatim to the input of the assembler. More documentation of how, for example, GCC implements this feature, can be found here.

By the way, if you want to alter the value of the stack pointer (why?), you can do it in one line:

__asm__("mov esp, eax");

Upvotes: 4

Related Questions