Reputation: 18557
There are 2 ways to call the parent constructor in the child.
var A = function A() {
this.x = 123;
};
var B = function B() {
// 1. call directly
A.call(this);
// 2. call from prototype
A.prototype.constructor.call(this);
};
B.prototype = Object.create(A.prototype);
B.prototype.constructor = B;
Are there any situations when one would be safer/better than the other, or are they always equivalent?
Upvotes: 11
Views: 6518
Reputation: 74204
It's always better to use the base constructor directly for the following reasons:
prototype.constructor
.A
inherits from C
, but I forgot to set A.prototype.constructor
back to A
. So it now points to C
. This causes problems in the constructor B
if we use the second method:
var C = function C() {
// some code
};
var A = function A() {
this.x = 123;
};
A.prototype = Object.create(C.prototype);
// I forgot to uncomment the next line:
// A.prototype.constructor = A;
var B = function B() {
// 1. call directly
A.call(this);
// 2. call from prototype
A.prototype.constructor.call(this); // A.prototype.constructor is C, not A
};
B.prototype = Object.create(A.prototype);
B.prototype.constructor = B;
Upvotes: 18