Reputation: 1022
We need to transpose data from the rows in a table to the output table such that that multiple rows are returned for every row in the input table. The logic for extracting data in each row of the output depends if value is present in a given column in the input row.
For e.g.
Input table
A, B, C, D, E, F
Output table
A, B, C, [if value present in D then some operation on value in D]
A, B, C, [if value present in E then some operation on value in E]
A, B, C, [if value present in F then some operation on value in F]
For doing this I intend to something like this:
private IEnumerable<OutputRow> BuildOutputTable(DataTable inputTable)
{
var outputRows = from inputRow in inputTable.AsEnumerable()
select new outputRow(inputRow, *delegateToProcessor*);
return gbbOutputRows;
}
But this will need me to iterate through for each of the additional value columns. Can I avoid that and just pass a single delegate so that the 'select new outputrow' returns me multiple rows?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 17598
Reputation: 18443
Create a function like this:
public IEnumerable<OutputRow> GetOutputRows(InputRow input)
{
if ( ** some condition on input.D ** )
yield return new OutputRow(inputRow, *delegateToProcessor*);
if ( ** some condition on input.E ** )
yield return new OutputRow(inputRow, *delegateToProcessor*);
if ( ** some condition on input.F ** )
yield return new OutputRow(inputRow, *delegateToProcessor*);
}
and your query goes like this:
var outputRows = from inputRow in inputTable.AsEnumerable()
from row2 in GetOutputRows(inputRow)
select row2;
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 10257
what about this:
private IEnumerable<OutputRow> BuildOutputTable(DataTable inputTable)
{
var tmp = from inputRow in inputTable.AsEnumerable()
select new { x = getProcessedRows(inputRow)};
var outputRows = tmp.SelectMany(x=>x.x);
return outputRows;
}
private IEnumerable<OutputRow> getProcessedRows(YourInputRowType inputRow)
{
List<OutputRow> ret = new List<OutputRow>()
/* some logic here to generate the output rows for this input row */
return ret;
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 3315
The select statement of linq can only select 1 object at the time. You could however select a group and afterwards do a union.
The result would look something like this :
public static void test()
{
var data = new List<String>{"a","b","c","d"};
var outputRows = from inputRow in data
select Expand(inputRow);
var result = new List<String>();
outputRows.ToList().ForEach(r=>result = r.Union(result).ToList());
}
private static List<String> Expand(string data)
{
var subdata = new List<String>();
subdata.Add(data + "1");
subdata.Add(data + "2");
return subdata;
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 46008
I would do:
var DRows = from inputRow in inputTable.AsEnumerable()
where inputRow.D == 'some value'
select new outputRow(inputRow, *delegateToProcessor*)
var ERows = from inputRow in inputTable.AsEnumerable()
where inputRow.E == 'some value'
select new outputRow(inputRow, *delegateToProcessor*)
var FRows = from inputRow in inputTable.AsEnumerable()
where inputRow.F == 'some value'
select new outputRow(inputRow, *delegateToProcessor*)
return DRows.Union(ERows).Union(FRows);
Upvotes: 1