Reputation: 145
Given the following code:
public class MainClass {
public static int f(){
int i=0;
i++;
return i;
}
}
the compiler javac produces the following code:
Compiled from "MainClass.java"
public class latte_jvm.MainClass {
public static int f();
Code:
0: iconst_0
1: istore_0
2: iinc 0, 1
5: iload_0
6: ireturn
}
Function f does really simple thing - it just returns 1. It's so directly translated that it makes me hard to believe that java compiler does any optimizations at all. Why java compiler creators decided to not do such optimizations in the compilation phase?
Upvotes: 8
Views: 873
Reputation: 45453
Also, by moving optimization to JVM, all JVM based languages can benefit. Compilers (not just javac) have a relatively easier job; language inventors don't have to be optimization experts.
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 1503799
Is so directly translated that it makes me hard to believe that java compiler does any optimizations at all.
Indeed. Most Java optimization is performed at JIT-time instead. The Java maintainers found out quite a while ago that in many cases, optimizations performed at compile-time actually hindered more important optimizations at JIT-time.
For a few years now, the -O
command-line argument has done nothing - and very deliberately so.
Upvotes: 17