Reputation: 47071
Input1:
(decompose '(* 1 2 3 4))
Output1:
'(* 1 (* 2 (* 3 4)))
Input2
(decompose '(+ 1 2 3 (* 5 6 7)))
Output2
'(+ 1 (+ 2 (+ 3 (* 5 (* 6 7)))))
Does anyone have ideas about this?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 522
Reputation: 47071
Modified from Chris Jester-Young
's solution:
(define (decompose x)
(if (pair? x)
(let ((operator (car x))
(expanded-x (map decompose x)))
(let decompose-helper ((operands (cdr expanded-x)))
(if (<= (length operands) 2)
(cons operator operands)
(list operator (car operands) (decompose-helper (cdr operands))))))
x))
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 236094
I see you posted your own solution, so I guess it's ok to show my complete answer. Here's another possible implementation, as a mutually-recursive pair of procedures. I like the fact that this solution doesn't require using length
or list?
(which might entail unnecessary traversals over the list), and uses only elementary functions (no foldr
, reverse
, map
or any other higher-order procedures are needed.)
(define (decompose lst)
(if (or (null? lst) ; if the list is empty
(null? (cdr lst)) ; or has only one element
(null? (cddr lst))) ; or has only two elements
lst ; then just return the list
(process (car lst) ; else process car of list (operator)
(cdr lst)))) ; together with cdr of list (operands)
(define (process op lst)
(cond ((null? (cdr lst)) ; if there's only one element left
(if (not (pair? (car lst))) ; if the element is not a list
(car lst) ; then return that element
(decompose (car lst)))) ; else decompose that element
((not (pair? (car lst))) ; if current element is not a list
(list op ; build a list with operator,
(car lst) ; current element,
(process op (cdr lst)))) ; process rest of list
(else ; else current element is a list
(list op ; build a list with operator,
(decompose (car lst)) ; decompose current element,
(process op (cdr lst)))))) ; process rest of list
It works for your examples, and then some:
(decompose '(* 1 2 3 4))
=> '(* 1 (* 2 (* 3 4)))
(decompose '(+ 1 2 3 (* 5 6 7)))
=> '(+ 1 (+ 2 (+ 3 (* 5 (* 6 7)))))
(decompose '(+ 1 (* 4 5 6) 2 3))
=> '(+ 1 (+ (* 4 (* 5 6)) (+ 2 3)))
(decompose '(+ 1 2 3 (* 5 6 7) 8))
=> '(+ 1 (+ 2 (+ 3 (+ (* 5 (* 6 7)) 8))))
(decompose '(+ 1 2 3 (* 5 6 7) (* 8 9 10) (* 11 12 (- 1))))
=> '(+ 1 (+ 2 (+ 3 (+ (* 5 (* 6 7)) (+ (* 8 (* 9 10)) (* 11 (* 12 (- 1))))))))
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 223123
Same way as you would evaluate it, but instead of outputting the result, you simply output the expression that would be used.
Here's my implementation, tested on Racket:
(define (decompose expr)
(define (expand x)
(if (list? x)
(decompose x)
x))
(define oper (car expr))
(let next ((args (map expand (cdr expr))))
(if (<= (length args) 2)
(cons oper args)
(list oper (car args) (next (cdr args))))))
Upvotes: 2