Reputation: 521
So I am trying to use the SELECT Distinct option on my table
Hashlog.select("DISTINCT tag").select("created_at").order("created_at DESC").limit(10)
1.9.3-p286 :017 > Hashlog.select("DISTINCT tag").select("created_at").order("created_at DESC").limit(10)
Hashlog Load (0.7ms) SELECT DISTINCT tag, created_at FROM "hashlogs" ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 10
=> [#<Hashlog tag: "new", created_at: "2012-12-11 04:06:37">,
#<Hashlog tag: "now", created_at: "2012-12-11 04:06:33">,
#<Hashlog tag: "googleold", created_at: "2012-12-11 04:06:28">,
#<Hashlog tag: "google", created_at: "2012-12-11 04:06:26">,
#<Hashlog tag: "facebook", created_at: "2012-12-11 04:06:21">,
#<Hashlog tag: "facebook", created_at: "2012-12-11 04:06:18">,
#<Hashlog tag: "faceboot", created_at: "2012-12-11 04:06:15">]
So I want the results to only unique on the tag column, but it will not let me order by created_at unless its passed through the select.
Upvotes: 1
Views: 4431
Reputation: 83
I have used this following snippet in my project
Product.select("DISTINCT(products.material_id), products.material_id, products.class_id").where('products.class_id' => current_user.class_id)
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 8892
I think what you're trying to do is select distinct tag values ordered by the earliest (i.e. smallest) created_at
for each tag. That would be one way to resolve the ambiguity resulting from a tag with multiple associated created_at
values.
If that's the case, try something like the following:
Hashlog.select("tag, min(created_at) as earliest").group("tag").order("earliest DESC").limit(10)
.
Upvotes: 4