Reputation: 9631
While helping a friend with a git problem today, I had to introduce a
branch that needed to be totally separate from the master
branch.
The contents of this branch really had a different origin from what
had been developed on the master
branch, but they were going to be
merged into the master
branch at a later time.
I remembered from reading John Wiegley's Git from the bottom up how branches are essentially a label to a commit that follows a certain convention and how a commit is tied to a tree of files and, optionally to parent commits. We went to create a parentless commit to the existing repository using git's plumbing:
So we got rid of all files in the index ...
$ git rm -rf .
... extracted directories and files from a tarball, added those to the index ...
$ git add .
... and created a tree object ...
$ git write-tree
(git-write-tree
told us the sha1sum of the created tree object.)
Then, We committed the tree, without specifying parent commits...
$ echo "Imported project foo" | git commit-tree $TREE
(git-commit-tree
told us the sha1sum of the created commit object.)
... and created a new branch that points to our newly created commit.
$ git update-ref refs/heads/other-branch $COMMIT
Finally, we returned to the master
branch to continue work there.
$ git checkout -f master
This seems to have worked as planned. But this is clearly not the kind of procedure I would recommend to someone who is just getting started using git, to put it mildly. Is there an easier way of creating a new branch that is entirely unrelated to everything that has happened in the repository so far?
Upvotes: 409
Views: 131730
Reputation: 13372
In recent Git versions, 2.27 at least, this can be cleanly achieved with the switch
command:
git switch --orphan <new-branch>
The working directory is cleaned automatically, though untracked files are left.
Upvotes: 41
Reputation: 2638
Creating a separate repository worked well for me. Didn't have to worry about a <start_point>.
gh-pages
This method is mentioned on:
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 440
The currently selected answer is correct, I would just add that coincidentally...
This is actually exactly how github.com lets users create Github Pages for their repos, thru an orphaned branch called gh-pages
.
The pretty steps are given and explained here:
https://help.github.com/articles/creating-project-pages-manually
Basically the git commands to set this up are as follows:
git checkout --orphan gh-pages
(create a parentless branch called gh-pages on your repo)git rm -rf .
(removes any files from branch working tree)rm '.gitignore'
(even the gitignore)Note you can also designate a /docs folder on you repo to be the source of the "Project Site" that Github uses to build the website.
Hope this helps!
Upvotes: 21
Reputation: 1328992
If your existing content was already committed, you now (Git 2.18 Q2 2018) can extract it into its own new orphan branch, since the implementation of "git rebase -i --root
" has been updated to use
the sequencer machinery more.
That sequencer is the one now allowing to transplant the whole topology of commit graph elsewhere.
See commit 8fa6eea, commit 9c85a1c, commit ebddf39, commit 21d0764, commit d87d48b, commit ba97aea (03 May 2018) by Johannes Schindelin (dscho
).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster
-- in commit c5aa4bc, 30 May 2018)
sequencer: allow introducing new root commits
In the context of the new
--rebase-merges
mode, which was designed specifically to allow for changing the existing branch topology liberally, a user may want to extract commits into a completely fresh branch that starts with a newly-created root commit.This is now possible by inserting the command
reset [new root]
beforepick
ing the commit that wants to become a root commit. Example:
reset [new root]
pick 012345 a commit that is about to become a root commit
pick 234567 this commit will have the previous one as parent
This does not conflict with other uses of the
reset
command because[new root]
is not (part of) a valid ref name: both the opening bracket as well as the space are illegal in ref names.
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 4052
Sometimes I just want to create empty branch in project instantly then start doing work, I will just excute following command :
git checkout --orphan unrelated.branch.name
git rm --cached -r .
echo "init unrelated branch" > README.md
git add README.md
git commit -m "init unrelated branch"
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 7770
There is a new feature (since V1.7.2) which makes this task a little more high-level than what's in any of the other answers.
git checkout
now supports the --orphan
option. From the man page:
git checkout [-q] [-f] [-m] --orphan <new_branch> [<start_point>]
Create a new orphan branch, named <new_branch>, started from <start_point> and switch to it. The first commit made on this new branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new history totally disconnected from all the other branches and commits.
This doesn't do exactly what the asker wanted, because it populates the index and the working tree from <start_point>
(since this is, after all, a checkout command). The only other action necessary is to remove any unwanted items from the working tree and index. Unfortunately, git reset --hard
doesn't work, but git rm -rf .
can be used instead (I believe this is equivalent to rm .git/index; git clean -fdx
given in other answers).
In summary:
git checkout --orphan newbranch
git rm -rf .
<do work>
git add your files
git commit -m 'Initial commit'
I left <start_point>
unspecified because it defaults to HEAD, and we don't really care anyway. This sequence does essentially the same thing as the command sequence in Artem's answer, just without resorting to scary plumbing commands.
Upvotes: 603
Reputation: 3543
Found this script at http://wingolog.org/archives/2008/10/14/merging-in-unrelated-git-branches and it works very fine !
#!/bin/bash
set -e
if test -z "$2" -o -n "$3"; then
echo "usage: $0 REPO BRANCHNAME" >&2
exit 1
fi
repo=$1
branch=$2
git fetch "$repo" "$branch"
head=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
fetched=$(git rev-parse FETCH_HEAD)
headref=$(git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name HEAD)
git checkout $fetched .
tree=$(git write-tree)
newhead=$(echo "merged in branch '$branch' from $repo" | git commit-tree $tree -p $head -p $fetched)
git update-ref $headref $newhead $head
git reset --hard $headref
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 323932
Although the solution with git symbolic-ref
and removing index works, it might be conceptually cleaner to create new repository
$ cd /path/to/unrelated
$ git init
[edit and add files]
$ git add .
$ git commit -m "Initial commit of unrelated"
[master (root-commit) 2a665f6] Initial commit of unrelated
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 foo
then fetch from it
$ cd /path/to/repo
$ git fetch /path/to/unrelated master:unrelated-branch
warning: no common commits
remote: Counting objects: 3, done.
Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), done.
remote: Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
From /path/to/unrelated
* [new branch] master -> unrelated-branch
Now you can delete /path/to/unrelated
Upvotes: 32
Reputation: 994619
Github has a feature called Project Pages where you can create a particular named branch in your project to provide files that will be served by Github. Their instructions are as follows:
$ cd /path/to/fancypants
$ git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/gh-pages
$ rm .git/index
$ git clean -fdx
From there you have an empty repository which you can then add your new content to.
Upvotes: 13
Reputation: 21726
From Git Community Book:
git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/newbranch
rm .git/index
git clean -fdx
<do work>
git add your files
git commit -m 'Initial commit'
Upvotes: 37