Reputation: 27413
In my attempt to compile GCC I noticed that while ./configure
doesn't yield error messages and returns an error code of 0, there are still errors logged in config.log
, which do later on cause make
to fail. So, why doesn't configure
fail already? Or does make
modify config.log
later on?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 459
Reputation: 3887
config.log
contains the output of all configure
probes. Some of them are expected to fail. For example, frequently Autoconf probes for several different possible alternative implementations of particular functionality, and some of them are expected to fail depending on the characteristics of your system.
It's therefore up to the author of the Autoconf configure.ac
script to explicitly fail the configure step if the results are not viable. Some people do this when writing their configure.ac
and some don't. Sometimes it can be quite hard to know at configure time whether a particular set of findings are viable. There's also a reasonable argument that it's easier to diagnose problems during the build, later on, than to issue an error message from configure
and make people search through config.log
for the details. That's particularly the case if the problems are relatively obscure.
The short answer is that configure
didn't fail because the people who wrote the configure script you're running didn't program it to fail for the specific errors that you're seeing, for one reason or another.
Upvotes: 4