CODEWITHSUNDEEP
algorithmsortingpointersdata-structureslinked-list
Dipesh Gupta
Dipesh Gupta

Reputation: 799

Merging two halves of a singly linked list


In a written test I came across a question which reads as follows:

We are given an integer linked list of which both first half and second half are sorted independently. Write a function to merge the two parts to create one single sorted linked list.

Constraint: do not use any extra space.

Test Cases and output:
Input List1 :
4->5->6->7->1->2->3;
Output :
1->2->3->4->5->6->7

Input 2:
5->6->7->8->1->2->3->4;
Output 2 :
1->2->3->4->5->6->7->8

What I can think of is by using two pointers: one for the first half traversal and one for the second half traversal. Using them I can traverse from head to middle (using 1st pointer) and from middle to last (using 2nd Pointer). While traversing both parts simultaneously, I can compare values and swap when needed.

But this solution employs use of two pointers which consumes memory.

Can it be done without using any memory?

As it was a written test, I cannot ask for clarifications.
Assistance is appreciated. Thanks.

Upvotes: 2

Views: 742

Answers (1)

Sergey Kalinichenko
Sergey Kalinichenko

Reputation: 726809

When they say "do not use extra space", they do not mean pointers and scalars; they do mean "arrays" and "dynamically allocated structures". In your case, the amount of memory is fixed.

Merging two ordered lists is simple: first, cut the list in half, and then re-arrange next pointers of its elements to make the list sorted.

You will need three pointers - newHead, head1, and head2.

  • Initialize head1 and head2 to the head of the original list
  • Advance head2 until you see a break in the sorted sequence (i.e. when head2->next->value is less than head2->value). Cut the list there by setting head2->next to NULL; keep the original head2->next - it is your new head2

At this point, you have two independently ordered, separate linked lists, and you can apply the classic merge algorithm. Set newHead to the smaller element of head1 or head2, and then move in a loop, setting the next pointer of the current last element to the smaller of head1 or head2. Once you hit head1->next == NULL or head2->next == NULL, assign the head of the other list to the next of the list that ran out of elements first. You are done - newHead now points to the beginning of a sorted list.

Upvotes: 4

Related Questions