CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c++variablesmemory-address
Computernerd
Computernerd

Reputation: 7766

Assignment of address to integer variable

How come you can assign an address to an integer variable like this,the complier will not give an error. i always though you can only assign integer values to a integer variable

int a=0x28ff1c

You can do the same for a char variable, the complier will not give a error

char b=0x28ff1c

It will output on the console screen rubbish value for char b and a random value for int a

cout<<b
    <<endl;
cout<<a;

Can someone explain to me why there is a difference in the output for char b and int a. Can someone aslo explain to me why a char variable and integer variable can have addresses assign to it

Upvotes: 5

Views: 4770

Answers (4)

Shan
Shan

Reputation: 5242

You can also use *(int *)(Address) = value as a construct to assigne a value to Address and use the answer by @Luchian Grigore

Upvotes: 0

Bart van Ingen Schenau
Bart van Ingen Schenau

Reputation: 15768

The number 0x28ff1c is just the hexadecimal (base-16) representation of the decimal (base-10) number 2686748. As cout defaults to printing decimal values for integers, that is probably the number you got printed.

The case with char b = 0x28ff1c is slightly different, because

  1. char is not large enough to hold that value. The practical result is that it gets truncated to 0x1c.
  2. cout treats char specially, because it is normally used to hold textual data, so cout prints the character that has the code 0x1c, which is some kind of control character. You could try it with 0x41 for example (which represents 'A' in ASCII and UTF-8).

And note that there is nothing that marks 0x28ff1c as being an address. An address would be formed by &a or (void*)0x28ff1c.

Upvotes: 5

Vincent Ramdhanie
Vincent Ramdhanie

Reputation: 103135

Because in any literal starting 0x is actually an integer. So it is allowed. An address is can sometimes be an integer.

Upvotes: 1

Luchian Grigore
Luchian Grigore

Reputation: 258618

0x28ff1c is not an address itself - it's just a hexadecimal number.

The following are equivalent:

int a =   2686748;  //decimal number
int a =  0x28ff1c;  //hexadecimal number
int a = 012177434;  //octal number

An address is represented by a pointer - if it's just that, an address, you can use a void*:

void* p = (void*)0x28ff1c;

In which case

int a = p;

wouldn't compile. p is an address, the number itself isn't.

Upvotes: 7

Related Questions