Reputation: 9809
I have a thread which does an action only when it gets exclusive access to 2 semaphores.
public void run(){
boolean a1=false;
boolean a2=false;
boolean a3=false;
while(true){
try{
if(res[1].tryAcquire()==true){
a1=true;
if((res[2].tryAcquire()==true){
a2=true;
if(res[3].tryAcquire()==true)){
a3=true;
System.out.println("Rolled the tobacco");
}
}
}
}
finally{
if(a1){
a1=false;
res[1].release();
}
if(a2){
a2=false;
res[2].release();
}
if(a3){
a3=false;
res[3].release();
}
}
}
}
}
Is there a better way to write this to make sure we do not upset the semaphore acquired count? Is there a way to check if a semaphore is acquired by the current thread?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 607
Reputation: 109557
In Java 7 a try with Closeable
is possible. There certainly must be nicer solutions.
public class Region implements Closeable {
private final Semaphore semaphore;
public Region(Semaphore semaphore) {
this.semaphore = semaphore;
if (!semaphore.tryAcquire()) {
throw NotAcquiredException(semaphore);
}
}
@Override
public void close() {
semaphore.release();
}
}
public class NotAcquiredException extends Exception { ... }
Usage:
public void run() {
boolean a1 = false;
boolean a2 = false;
boolean a3 = false;
while (true) {
try (Closeable r1 = new Region(res[1])) {
a1 = true;
try (Closeable r2 = new Region(res[2])) {
a2 = true;
try (Closeable r3 = new Region(res[3])) {
a3 = true;
System.out.println("Rolled the tobacco");
} catch (IOException e) {
}
} catch (IOException e) {
}
} catch (IOException e) {
}
}
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 11543
You could separate each acquire into a try...finally, not shorter, but gets rid of some variables and makes it fairly obvious what should happen for each lock. (I changed the array to zero based)
public void run(){
while(true){
if(res[0].tryAcquire()){
try {
if(res[1].tryAcquire()) {
try {
if(res[2].tryAcquire()){
try {
System.out.println("Rolled the tobacco");
} finally {
res[3].release();
}
}
} finally {
res[2].release();
}
}
} finally{
res[1].release();
}
}
}
}
If you need to acquire a lot of locks or do this in several places, then maybe a helper class would be nice. At least hides the boilerplate code of acquire and releasing the semaphores.
public void run() {
SemaphoreHelper semaphoreHelper = new SemaphoreHelper(res);
while (true) {
try {
if (semaphoreHelper.aquireAll()) {
System.out.println("Rolled the tobacco");
}
} finally {
semaphoreHelper.releaseAquired();
}
}
}
private static class SemaphoreHelper {
private final Semaphore[] semaphores;
private int semaphoreIndex;
public SemaphoreHelper(Semaphore[] semaphores) {
this.semaphores = semaphores;
}
public void releaseAquired() {
while (semaphoreIndex > 0) {
semaphoreIndex--;
semaphores[semaphoreIndex].release();
}
}
public boolean aquireAll() {
while (semaphoreIndex < semaphores.length) {
if (!semaphores[semaphoreIndex].tryAcquire()) {
return false;
}
semaphoreIndex++;
}
return true;
}
}
Upvotes: 1