CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#classmethodsartificial-intelligencemember-functions
ErikMuir
ErikMuir

Reputation: 181

Can a class method have different code for each instance of the class?

I want to create a class (eg. Person) with a member function (eg. giveCharity), but I want the contents of that method to be different for each instance of the class, imitating artificial intelligence. Is this possible? When and how would I populate the code for each instance's method?

Here's an example:

public class Person
{
    // data members
    private int myNumOfKids;
    private int myIncome;
    private int myCash;

    // constructor
    public Person(int kids, int income, int cash)
    {
        myNumOfKids = kids;
        myIncome = income;
        myCash = cash;
    }

    // member function in question
    public int giveCharity(Person friend)
    {
        int myCharity;
        // This is where I want to input different code for each person
        // that determines how much charity they will give their friend
        // based on their friend's info (kids, income, cash, etc...),
        // as well as their own tendency for compassion.
        myCash -= myCharity;
        return myCharity;
    }
}

Person John = new Person(0, 35000, 500);
Person Gary = new Person(3, 40000, 100);

// John gives Gary some charity
Gary.myCash += John.giveCharity(Gary);

Upvotes: 1

Views: 613

Answers (2)

Servy
Servy

Reputation: 203821

There are two primary approaches that come to mind:

1) Give each person a delegate that defines the function:

public Func<int> CharityFunction{get;set;}

Then you just need to figure out how to set it, and ensure it's always set before using it. To call it just say:

int charityAmount = CharityFunction();

2) Make Person an abstract class. Add an abstract function like int getCharityAmount(). Then create new sub-types that each provide a different implementation of that abstract function.

As for which to use, that will depend more on specifics. Do you have a lot of different definitions of functions? The first option takes less effort to add a new one. Does the function ever change after an object is created? That's not possible with the second option, only the first. Do you re-use the same functions a lot? The second option is better in that case, so that the callers aren't constantly re-defining the same small handful of functions. The second is also a bit safer in that the function will always have a definition, and you know it won't be changed once the object is created, etc.

Upvotes: 5

fo_x86
fo_x86

Reputation: 2613

Why not construct the Person object by passing in a function object Charity that implements the different giveCharity(Person friend) methods.

Then the person.giveCharity(Person friend) can simply call my_charity.giveCharity(friend).

Upvotes: 0

Related Questions