CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#timerpausing-execution
Adrian
Adrian

Reputation: 183

pausing program without interrupting timers c#

I am writing a program that has several "Worker" objects going off and doing tasks that take as set amount of time. I have created a worker class with an internal timer that is working fine. However, when doing the "work" i will at times need to wait several seconds for a screen refresh (each worker is scraping data from a remote screen and doing some automation).

For those pauses, i don't want to sleep the thread, because as i understand it that will also pause the timers on the other worker objects (my application is a single thread because, frankly, I'm brand new to C# and i didn't want to overreach). Is there another waiting function that i can use that doesn't actually hang the whole thread?

Some additional info:

Code below (the actual work will be done using the "startWorking" method, but nothing is implemented - this is just my sold build with timers working. Also, the main is just being used for testing multiple timers right now)

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Timers;

namespace Multi_Timers
{
//worker class that includes a timer
public class Worker
{
    private Timer taskTimer;
    private bool available = true;
    private string workerName;
    private string startWork;
    private int workTime;

    // properties
    public bool isAvailable { get { return this.available; } }
    public string name { get { return this.workerName; } }

    // constructor
    public Worker(string name)
    {
        this.workerName = name;
        Console.WriteLine("{0} is initialized", name);
    }

    // start work timer
    public void startWorking(int duration) {

        if (this.available == true)
        {
            this.available = false;
            this.taskTimer = new Timer();
            this.taskTimer.Interval = duration;
            this.taskTimer.Elapsed += new ElapsedEventHandler(doneWorking);
            this.taskTimer.Enabled = true;
            this.startWork = DateTime.Now.ToString();
            this.workTime = duration / 1000;
        }
        else Console.WriteLine("Sorry, {0} was not available to work", this.workerName);
    }

    // Handler for timer
    public void doneWorking(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e)
    {
        Console.WriteLine("{0}: {1} / {2} min / {3}", this.workerName, this.startWork, this.workTime/60, e.SignalTime.ToLocalTime());
        this.taskTimer.Enabled = false;

        this.available = true;

    }
}

//main program
class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        Random r = new Random();

        // initialize worker(s)
        Worker bob = new Worker("Bob");
        Worker bill = new Worker("Bill");
        Worker jim = new Worker("Jim");

        // q to exit
        while (true)
        {
            if (bob.isAvailable) {

                bob.startWorking(r.Next(1 * 60, 150 * 60) * 1000);
            }
            if (bill.isAvailable)
            {
                bill.startWorking(r.Next(1 * 60, 150 * 60) * 1000);
            }
            if (jim.isAvailable)
            {
                jim.startWorking(r.Next(1 * 60, 150 * 60) * 1000);
            }

        }
    }
}
}

Thank you for any help in advance! Reading examples from this community was definitely key in teaching myself a little bit of C# to get started with!

Upvotes: 1

Views: 762

Answers (2)

Caster Troy
Caster Troy

Reputation: 2866

If you ever find yourself wanting to delay execution again in a different context you could consider an implementation like this: 

private static void DelayExecution(Action action, TimeSpan delay)
{
    TimeSpan start = DateTime.Now.TimeOfDay;
    Thread t = new Thread(() =>
    {
        while (DateTime.Now.TimeOfDay < start.Add(delay))
        {
            //Block
        }
        action.Invoke();
    });
    t.Start();
}

private static void Main(string[] args)
{
    DelayExecution(() => Console.WriteLine("Delayed Execution"), TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1));
    Console.ReadLine();
}

Upvotes: -1

Servy
Servy

Reputation: 203829

i don't want to sleep the thread, because as i understand it that will also pause the timers on the other worker objects

That is incorrect; it will not stop the timers.

my application is a single thread

No, actually, it's not. The timers will be creating and using other threads to implement their behavior. The Elapsed event handlers will be fired from a thread pool thread.

One major issue with your code is that your main method is doing a "busywait" on the three objects, constantly polling them asking if they're done. This is...expensive. It's basically like you're kids asking, "Are we there yet." a few hundred times a second. Wouldn't it be so much nicer if they just sat their waiting until you told them you were done! (That's quite possible, and a good possible option.)

One of the simpler solutions in this case would be to do the loop in the worker, not Main. Have the implementation of startWorking wrapped in a while loop, and have main just do a wait forever (i.e. Thread.Sleep(Timeout.Infinite);). More complex options would be having the workers provide a Task, event, or blocking wait (also called a "Join") method to indicate when they are finished.

The option you're considering, that of adding a Thread.Sleep of a little while in Main will help, but it's only telling your kids to ask you when you're there less often, rather than having them wait for you to tell them when you're there.

Upvotes: 3

Related Questions