CODEWITHSUNDEEP
linuxbashgnu
Bengt
Bengt

Reputation: 14448

Recursively delete all files except a certain number in each directory

I have a large collection of files contained in directories for testing. I need to keep the directory structure for my application but want to thin out the files for faster testing. I want to limit the number of files a directory can have to 3. How can I do that in linux?

To clarify what I would like to accomplish, a solution in Python:

import sys, os
for root, dirs, files in os.walk(sys.argv[1]):
    for index, file in enumerate(files):
        if index > int(sys.argv[2]) - 1: os.remove(os.path.join(root, file))

Usage:

python thinout.py /path/to/thin\ out/ <maximum_number_of_files_per_directory>

Example:

python thinout.py testing\ data 3

I found a smiliar question about doing this for one directory, but not recursively.

Upvotes: 0

Views: 285

Answers (2)

Perleone
Perleone

Reputation: 4038

This quite lengthy sequence will work with files containing spaces etc., and just leave the first three alphabetically sorted files in each subdir.

EDIT: applied mklement's improvement to cope with directories that need escaping.

find /var/testfiles/ -type d -print0 | while IFS= read -r -d '' subdir; \
do cd "$subdir"; find . -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type f -print0 | \
sort --zero-terminated | tr '\0' '\n' | tail -n+4 | tr '\n' '\0' | \
xargs --null --no-run-if-empty rm ; cd "$OLDPWD" ; done

Since my version of tail doesn't support a --zero or --null flag for line terminators, I had to work around that with tr. Suggestions for improvements are welcome.

Upvotes: 0

Matt
Matt

Reputation: 111

I would do something like this in bash:

for dir in `find . -type d`; pushd $dir; rm `ls | awk 'NR>3'`; popd; done;

Or this version might be better:

for dir in `find . -type d`; pushd $dir; rm `find . -maxdepth 1 -type f | tail -n +3`; popd; done;

Of course - just randomly deleting all but the first 3 files in the directory is always a little risky. Buyer beware...

By the way, I did not test this myself. Just typed in what came to mind. You'll likely have to tweak it a little to get it to work right. Again, buyer beware.

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions