Reputation: 279
In the below case i want to match string "Singapore" where "S" should always be capital and rest of the words may be in lower or in uppercase. but in the below string "s" is in lower case and it gets matched in search condition. can any body let me know how to implement this?
import re
st = "Information in sinGapore "
if re.search("S""(?i)(ingapore)" , st):
print "matched"
Singapore => matched
sIngapore => notmatched
SinGapore => matched
SINGAPORE => matched
Upvotes: 2
Views: 1655
Reputation: 937
This is the BEST answer:
(?-i:S)(?i)ingapore
ClickHere for proof:
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 27575
Since you want to set a GV code according to the catched phrase (unique name or several name blank separated, I know that), there must be a step in which the code is choosen in a dictionary according to the catched phrase.
So it's easy to make a profit of this step to perform the test on the first letter (must be uppercased) or the first name in the phrase that no regex is capable of.
I choosed certain conditions to constitute the test. For example, a dot in a first name is not mandatory, but uppercased letters are. These conditions will be easily changed at need.
import re
def regexize(cntry):
def doot(x):
return '\.?'.join(ch for ch in x) + '\.?'
to_join = []
for c in cntry:
cspl = c.split(' ',1)
if len(cspl)==1: # 'Singapore','Austria',...
to_join.append('(%s)%s'
% (doot(c[0]), doot(c[1:])))
else: # 'Den LMM','LMM Den',....
to_join.append('(%s) +%s'
% (doot(cspl[0]),
doot(cspl[1].strip(' ').lower())))
pattern = '|'.join(to_join).join('()')
return re.compile(pattern,re.I)
def code(X,CNTR,r = regexize):
r = regexize(CNTR)
for ma in r.finditer(X):
beg = ma.group(1).split(' ')[0]
if beg==ma.group(1):
GV = countries[beg[0]+beg[1:].replace('.','').lower()] \
if beg[0].upper()==beg[0] else '- bad match -'
else:
try:
k = (ki for ki in countries.iterkeys()
if beg.replace('.','')==ki.split(' ')[0]).next()
GV = countries[k]
except StopIteration:
GV = '- bad match -'
yield ' {!s:15} {!s:^13}'.format(ma.group(1), GV)
countries = {'Singapore':'SG','Austria':'AU',
'Swiss':'CH','Chile':'CL',
'Den LMM':'DN','LMM Den':'LM'}
s = (' Singapore SIngapore SiNgapore SinGapore'
' SI.Ngapore SIngaPore SinGaporE SinGAPore'
' SINGaporE SiNg.aPoR singapore sIngapore'
' siNgapore sinGapore sINgap.ore sIngaPore'
' sinGaporE sinGAPore sINGaporE siNgaPoRe'
' Austria Aus.trIA aUSTria AUSTRiA'
' Den L.M.M Den Lm.M DEn Lm.M.'
' DEN L.MM De.n L.M.M. Den LmM'
' L.MM DEn LMM DeN LM.m Den')
print '\n'
print '\n'.join(res for res in code(s,countries))
I improved the code. It's shorter and more readable.
The instruction assert(.....]
is to verify that the keys of the dictionaru are well formed for the purpose.
import re
def doot(x):
return '\.?'.join(ch for ch in x) + '\.?'
def regexize(labels,doot=doot,
wg2 = '(%s) *( %s)',wnog2 = '(%s)(%s)',
ri = re.compile('(.(?!.*? )|[^ ]+)( ?) *(.+\Z)')):
to_join = []
modlabs = {}
for K in labels.iterkeys():
g1,g2,g3 = ri.match(K).groups()
to_join.append((wg2 if g2 else wnog2)
% (doot(g1), doot(g3.lower())))
modlabs[g1+g2+g3.lower()] = labels[K]
return (re.compile('|'.join(to_join), re.I), modlabs)
def code(X,labels,regexize = regexize):
reglab,modlabs = regexize(labels)
for ma in reglab.finditer(X):
a,b = tuple(x for x in ma.groups() if x)
k = (a + b.lower()).replace('.','')
GV = modlabs[k] if k in modlabs else '- bad match -'
yield ' {!s:15} {!s:^13}'.format(a+b, GV)
countries = {'Singapore':'SG','Austria':'AU',
'Swiss':'CH','Chile':'CL',
'Den LMM':'DN','LMM Den':'LM'}
assert(all('.' not in k and
(k.count(' ')==1 or k[0].upper()==k[0])
for k in countries))
s = (' Singapore SIngapore SiNgapore SinGapore'
' SI.Ngapore SIngaPore SinGaporE SinGAPore'
' SINGaporE SiNg.aPoR singapore sIngapore'
' siNgapore sinGapore sINgap.ore sIngaPore'
' sinGaporE sinGAPore sINGaporE siNgaPoRe'
' Austria Aus.trIA aUSTria AUSTRiA'
' Den L.M.M Den Lm.M DEn Lm.M.'
' DEN L.MM De.n L.M.M. Den LmM'
' L.MM DEn LMM DeN LM.m Den')
print '\n'.join(res for res in code(s,countries))
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 136231
As commented, the Ugly way would be:
>>> re.search("S[iI][Nn][Gg][Aa][Pp][Oo][Rr][Ee]" , "SingaPore")
<_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x10cea84a8>
>>> re.search("S[iI][Nn][Gg][Aa][Pp][Oo][Rr][Ee]" , "Information in sinGapore")
The more elegant way would be matching Singapore case-insensitive, and then checking that the first letter is S
:
reg=re.compile("singapore", re.I)
>>> s="Information in sinGapore"
>>> reg.search(s) and reg.search(s).group()[0]=='S'
False
>>> s="Information in SinGapore"
>>> reg.search(s) and reg.search(s).group()[0]=='S'
True
Following your comment - you could use:
reg.search(s).group().startswith("S")
Instead of:
reg.search(s).group()[0]==("S")
If it seems more readable.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 63739
You could write a simple lambda to generate the ugly-but-all-re-solution:
>>> leading_cap_re = lambda s: s[0].upper() + ''.join('[%s%s]' %
(c.upper(),c.lower())
for c in s[1:])
>>> leading_cap_re("Singapore")
'S[Ii][Nn][Gg][Aa][Pp][Oo][Rr][Ee]'
For multi-word cities, define a string-splitting version:
>>> leading_caps_re = lambda s : r'\s+'.join(map(leading_cap_re,s.split()))
>>> print leading_caps_re('Kuala Lumpur')
K[Uu][Aa][Ll][Aa]\s+L[Uu][Mm][Pp][Uu][Rr]
Then your code could just be:
if re.search(leading_caps_re("Singapore") , st):
...etc...
and the ugliness of the RE would be purely internal.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 34357
interestingly
/((S)((?i)ingapore))/
Does the right thing in perl but doesn't seem to work as needed in python. To be fair the python docs spell it out clearly, (?i) alters the whole regexp
Upvotes: 1