Reputation: 728
Question says it all really.
Would it be better to use const pointer members instead if I were to implement the default constructor?
Upvotes: 3
Views: 6409
Reputation: 82161
Well, it depends what you want your member to refer to in the default case. A possible solution is to have a default object (possibly some sort of Null object):
struct Foo
{
Foo() : bar_(defaultBar) {}
Foo(Bar &bar) : bar_(bar) {}
private:
Bar &bar_;
static Bar defaultBar;
};
Or, as @sftrabbit shows, you can get a reference to some object from some function.
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 110768
You need to use the member initialization list:
struct foo
{
const int& ref;
foo() : ref(some_value()) { }
}
Make sure some_value()
doesn't give you a temporary. It will only have its life extended until the end of the constructor:
A temporary bound to a reference member in a constructor’s ctor-initializer (12.6.2) persists until the constructor exits.
Upvotes: 5