Reputation: 9007
Table Visits;
fields[id,patient_id(fk),doctor_id(fk),flag(Xfk),type(Xfk),time_booked,date,...]
Xfk = it refer to other table, but its not a must to exist so i dont use constrain.
SELECT `v`.`date`, `v`.`time_booked`, `v`.`stats`, `p`.`name` as pt_name,
`d`.`name` as dr_name, `f`.`name` as flag_name, `f`.`color` as flag_color,
`vt`.`name` as type, `vt`.`color` as type_color
FROM (`visits` v, `users` p, `users` d, `flags` f, `visit_types` vt)
WHERE `p`.`id`=`v`.`patient_id`
AND `d`.`id`=`v`.`doctor_id`
AND `v`.`flag`=`f`.`id`
AND `v`.`type`=`vt`.`id`
AND `v`.`date` >= '2013-02-27'
AND (v.date <= DATE_ADD('2013-02-27', INTERVAL 7 DAY))
AND (`v`.`doctor_id`='00002' OR `v`.`doctor_id`='00001')
ORDER BY `v`.`date` ASC, `v`.`time_booked` ASC;
One big statmeant i have ! my question is,
1: should i consider using join instead of select multiple tables ? and if i should why ?
this query execution time is 0.0009 so i think its fine, and since i get all my data in one query, or is it bad practice ?
2: in the select part i want to say
if v.type != 0 select f.name,f.color
else i dont want to select them nither there tables flags f
is it possible ?
also currently if flag was not found, it replicate all rows as much as flag table have in rows ! is there a way i can prevent this ? both for flag and visit_types table ?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 131
Reputation: 7275
If it's running fast, I wouldn't mess with it. I generally prefer to use joins instead of matching stuff in the where clause.
Any chance you'd remove the ` characters? Just makes it a bit harder to read in my opinion.
Look at the case statement for MySQL: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/case.html
select case when v.type <> 0 then
f.name
else
''
end as name, ...
Upvotes: 1