Reputation: 35
My gut tells me that I'm making an obvious mistake, but it's escaping me. I'm attempting to make 'child' objects from a specified 'parent' object by use of the following example code.
local Ad = {
__index = Ad,
__tostring = function(self) return self.msg end,
__concat = function(a, b) return tostring(a)..tostring(b) end,
Initialize = function(self, msg, wgt)
if msg and msg ~= "" then
wgt = wgt or 1
self.msg, self.wgt, self.ranLog = msg, wgt, {}
end
end,
Increase = function(self)
if self.wgt < 9 then self.wgt = self.wgt + 1 end
end,
Decrease = function(self)
if self.wgt > 1 then self.wgt = self.wgt - 1 end
end
}
local function new(src, ...)
local o = setmetatable({}, src)
if src.Initialize then o:Initialize(...) end
return o
end
local ad = new(Ad, "Test Message")
print("Object - "..ad)
for k, v in pairs(ad) do print("", k, v) end
ad:Increase()
print("Modified Object - "..ad)
for k, v in pairs(ad) do print("", k, v) end
So that's verbatim what fails with an attempt to call method Initialize which is a nil value. Given that before this edit my sample code did work, is it a matter of how table Ad has been defined? Or do I have a syntax error in here somewhere?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 690
Reputation: 1015
The problem is this:
local Ad = {
__index = Ad,
...
}
At the time __index
is assigned, Ad
is nil
, because the table is constructed in full before being assigned to Ad
. Since __index
is unset, the lookup for Initialize
fails.
Instead, do something like:
local Ad = {
...
}
Ad.__index = Ad
Upvotes: 4